“…Our norms add a substantive number of adjectives to the growing set of Dutch experiential and distributional norms, and can easily be connected to the behavioral norm data that are amassing for Dutch, pertaining to lexical decision (Brysbaert, Stevens, Mandera, & Keuleers, 2016;Keuleers, Diependaele, & Brysbaert, 2010b), word prevalence (Keuleers et al, 2015), text reading (Cop, Dirix, Drieghe, & Duyck, 2017), and word fragment completion (Heyman, Van Akeren, Hutchison, & Storms, 2016). We believe the norms would benefit both research that studies adjectives proper (e.g., to establish a typology; Dixon, 1982;Raskin & Nirenburg, 1998) or in which adjectives constitute the preferred stimulus material such as vagueness (Hampton, 2011;Kennedy, 2007;Van Rooij, 2011;Verheyen & Egré, 2018), spatial cognition (Bianchi, Savardi, & Burro, 2011a;Bianchi, Savardi, & Kubovy, 2011b), affective word processing (Bernat, Bunce, & Shevrin, 2001;Herbert, Kissler, Junghofer, Peyk, & Rockstroh, 2006), and inference (Gotzner, Solt, & Benz, 2018;Ruytenbeek, Verheyen, & Spector, 2017). The norms can be used both as explanatory variables (Gilet & Jallais, 2011;Kuperman et al, 2014) and control variables (Estes & Adelman, 2008a;Larsen, Mercer, & Balota, 2006).…”