1980
DOI: 10.1002/bip.1980.360190913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA backbone conformation in cis–syn pyrimidine[]pyrimidine cyclobutane dimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the explanation of these seemingly contradictory observations lies in the relative stability of the conformation induced in DNA by the dimer and that most of the contacts crucial for photolyase binding lie on the dimer-containing strand. Many of the altered torsion angles predicted in the model of dimercontaining double-stranded DNA were originally observed by Broyde et al (2) in an energy-minimized model of single-stranded dimer-containing DNA; thus, the conformation induced by the dimer may be the energetically favored one for both single-and double-stranded DNA because of the inherent restriction of bond rotation in the sugar-phosphate backbone (28). This interpretation is consistent with our demonstration that E. coli photolyase binds with approximately equal affinity to double-or single-stranded DNA (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We believe that the explanation of these seemingly contradictory observations lies in the relative stability of the conformation induced in DNA by the dimer and that most of the contacts crucial for photolyase binding lie on the dimer-containing strand. Many of the altered torsion angles predicted in the model of dimercontaining double-stranded DNA were originally observed by Broyde et al (2) in an energy-minimized model of single-stranded dimer-containing DNA; thus, the conformation induced by the dimer may be the energetically favored one for both single-and double-stranded DNA because of the inherent restriction of bond rotation in the sugar-phosphate backbone (28). This interpretation is consistent with our demonstration that E. coli photolyase binds with approximately equal affinity to double-or single-stranded DNA (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This suggests that much of the binding specificity conferred by interactions within the active site cavity arises from differences in the energy cost of flipping two unlinked bases versus a dimer. Several studies suggest that the presence of a dimer in a DNA helix weakens stacking interactions with adjacent bases and hydrogen bonding with the partners of the dimerized bases (27)(28)(29), and thus the energetic cost of flipping a dimer out of the helix and into the active site cavity should be lower than the cost of flipping two noncovalently linked pyrimidines. The free energy contributed by interactions between cavity residues and the dimer is sufficient to stabilize the dimer in the flipped state but is not sufficient to stabilize two noncovalently linked pyrimidine bases flipped out of the helix.…”
Section: A Model For Dimer Binding By Photolyase-approximatelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the model these residues contact regions immediately 5Ј to the dimer (Lys 383 ) or 3Ј to the dimer (Arg 452 and Gln 514 ). Both molecular modeling studies and NMR experiments suggest that in dimer-containing DNA the helix is distorted at the nucleotide 5Ј to the dimer and the first and second nucleotides 3Ј to the dimer (27,28,32). Thus there is an excellent correlation between the DNA sites that promote dimer-specific recognition and the location of photolyase residues that contribute to specific binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleoside samples were lyophilized twice and dissolved in 99.9% D20 to a concentration of 0.05 M. Metal ions were removed using Chelex-100 resin columns (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Spectral analysis (LAOCOON 111) and computer simulated spectra were the final test of the chemical shift (6) and coupling constant ( J ) data listed in Tables 1 and 2. Pseudorotational parameters were calculated with the PSEUROT program (38) and are given in the relevant sections.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%