2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA extraction and purification from archival material: Revisiting the standard operating procedure

Abstract: A B S T R A C TForensic evidence from tissues embedded in paraffin archived for long periods and safeguarded in Pathology Institutes are, in some cases, the only sample available for DNA analysis. However, recovering DNA from this material can be challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate methods of extraction and purification of DNA, using biological archival materials, in order to determine a protocol that is easy use and efficiency to adapt to the Institute of Research and Expertise in Forensic Genet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of all the samples that were washed in ethanol only once demonstrated, without exception, considerable interference by proteins and phenol. In addition, the extracted DNA may display PCR inhibitors, similar to what was observed by Netto et al (2015). Furthermore, a DNA amount much greater than the ideal was observed in the quantification tests, affirming the need for serial dilutions to achieve ideal values of around 0.5 and 1.0 ng DNA/µL before PCR amplification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The results of all the samples that were washed in ethanol only once demonstrated, without exception, considerable interference by proteins and phenol. In addition, the extracted DNA may display PCR inhibitors, similar to what was observed by Netto et al (2015). Furthermore, a DNA amount much greater than the ideal was observed in the quantification tests, affirming the need for serial dilutions to achieve ideal values of around 0.5 and 1.0 ng DNA/µL before PCR amplification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This may be related to either DNA absorption or retention by each swab type, which varies considerably [19]. In this study, we only used organic extraction, which had its efficiency proved for low DNA‐content samples in a previous study [20]. Therefore, further studies should be carried out with different extraction methods so that the performance of different swabs on the same surfaces (gearshift knob, steering wheel, and parking brake lever) could be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%