1991
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.648-649.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA fingerprinting by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping to distinguish Pseudomonas cepacia isolates from a nosocomial outbreak

Abstract: We typed 40 isolates of Pseudomonas cepacia obtained from patients involved in a single outbreak using pulsed field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. All isolates from the majority of the patients, 16 of 18 (89%), were included in a single group. These typing methods should aid in the clarification of the epidemiology of infection with P. cepacia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE could successfully differentiate strains isolated from the different hospitals. Ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE are a powerful marker for classifying B. cepacia, as reported previously (2,18). A discrepancy between ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE was observed in only three strains tested in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE could successfully differentiate strains isolated from the different hospitals. Ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE are a powerful marker for classifying B. cepacia, as reported previously (2,18). A discrepancy between ribotyping and DNA fingerprinting by PFGE was observed in only three strains tested in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The epidemiology, diversity, and population structure of a number of pathogenic bacteria have been studied by several techniques that include serological analysis (9), analysis of whole-cell (6) and outer membrane protein (9) profiles, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (36,37,43,44), restriction endonuclease cleavage of chromosomal DNA (6,51), and the detection of specific restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) at specific loci or within rRNA operons (2,4,6,24,48,49). These techniques have been extremely valuable in identifying strains responsible for nosocomial infections and their transmission and maintenance in patients and in studies of bacterial pathogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypic characterization of strains may circumvent these difficulties. Indeed, analysis of the restriction fragment length polymorphism of total DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and analysis of the ribosomal DNA regions (ribotyping) have both been shown to be effective in distinguishing among P. cepacia strains (1,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%