2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Profiling and forensic dentistry – A review of the recent concepts and trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
58
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The durability of the human teeth plays an important part resisting to natural and PM alterations induced by men (Vieira et al, 2010;Manjunath et al, 2011), such as putrefaction and carbonization, respectively. Cadaveric alterations evolved following the current changes in criminality, which includes more complex mechanisms compared to decades ago.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The durability of the human teeth plays an important part resisting to natural and PM alterations induced by men (Vieira et al, 2010;Manjunath et al, 2011), such as putrefaction and carbonization, respectively. Cadaveric alterations evolved following the current changes in criminality, which includes more complex mechanisms compared to decades ago.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interesting fact is that the tooth is the hardest structure withstanding temperatures even as high as 1600°C and thereby resisting potentially destruction and decomposition for considerable periods after death. [13] The next dimension of forensic is reflected by autopsy which is upgraded by Virtopsy. Respecting deeply the human body even after death, in exploring, the cause of death is Virtopsy -a recent advance outshining conventional autopsy.…”
Section: Forensic Identification and Virtopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical statistics from the US show that approximately 15% of all couples of reproductive age are unable to conceive naturally (Fernandez et al 1991). 3 Approximately 10% of couples at child bearing ages suffered from some kind of infertility and about half of these cases are because of male factors (de Kretser and Baker 1999), 2 which recently became a hot issue in the relevant studies. The Y chromosome microdeletions are the most common genetic causes of male infertility due to spermatogenesis failure and have been reported in 2.7 to 55.5% of infertile men (Krausz et al 2000) 4 and (Simoni et al 1999) 5 The frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions increases with the severity of spermatogenesis defect (Krausz and McElreavey, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%