2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2017.2703624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNN-Based Predictive Magnetic Flux Reference for Harmonic Compensation Control in Magnetically Unbalanced Induction Motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic flux sensors can be installed at various locations inside electrical machines. Here, these positions are categorised as follows (see Figure 4): � IPS1: a search coil (SC) around a stator tooth in induction machines (IMs) [4,[40][41][42][43][44] and permanent magnet machines (PMMs) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], � IPS2: an SC which its straight section goes inside the slot under the stator slot wedge and comes out of the machine through holes in stator housing [53],…”
Section: Internal Magnetic Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic flux sensors can be installed at various locations inside electrical machines. Here, these positions are categorised as follows (see Figure 4): � IPS1: a search coil (SC) around a stator tooth in induction machines (IMs) [4,[40][41][42][43][44] and permanent magnet machines (PMMs) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], � IPS2: an SC which its straight section goes inside the slot under the stator slot wedge and comes out of the machine through holes in stator housing [53],…”
Section: Internal Magnetic Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic flux sensors can be installed at various locations inside electrical machines. Here, these positions are categorised as follows (see Figure 4): IPS1 : a search coil (SC) around a stator tooth in induction machines (IMs) [4, 40–44] and permanent magnet machines (PMMs) [45–52], IPS2 : an SC which its straight section goes inside the slot under the stator slot wedge and comes out of the machine through holes in stator housing [53], IPS3 : a Hall‐effect flux sensors (HEFSs)/flux‐gate magnetometer (FGM)/tunnelling magnetoresistor (TMR) on a stator tooth between the extension of two coils coming out of stator slots [54], IPS4 : an Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG)‐Terfenol‐D sensor in the stator slot wedge [32], and IPS5 : a HEFS/FGM/TMR on the stator bore inside the airgap. …”
Section: Magnetic Flux Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a rising interest in developing condition monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence techniques such as as support vector machine (SVM) [ 13 ], artificial neural networks (ANN) [ 14 ], Naïve Bayes classifier, Ensemble, k-nearest neighbours (KNN) or decision trees as they can determine not only the presence or absence but also the severity degree of given fault, which improves the reliability. In fact, they have been used to develop condition monitoring systems able to detect different types of faults such as broken rotor bar [ 15 , 16 ], stator short circuit [ 17 , 18 ] or bearing faults [ 14 , 16 , 19 ], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is hard to get a precise parametric fault model. Ghosh et al 6 propose harmonic compensation based on the deep neural network for stator interturn fault to ensure the continuity of the IM operation. Salmasi 7 propose the FTC for current and speed sensors without the need for the IM parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%