2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19071863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Actomyosin Single-Molecule Mechanics Data Predict Mechanics of Contracting Muscle?

Abstract: In muscle, but not in single-molecule mechanics studies, actin, myosin and accessory proteins are incorporated into a highly ordered myofilament lattice. In view of this difference we compare results from single-molecule studies and muscle mechanics and analyze to what degree data from the two types of studies agree with each other. There is reasonable correspondence in estimates of the cross-bridge power-stroke distance (7–13 nm), cross-bridge stiffness (~2 pN/nm) and average isometric force per cross-bridge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
(542 reference statements)
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of interest to consider the present results in relation to variability between different single molecule studies in key myosin properties such as step length, actomyosin stiffness and cross-bridge force (Kaya and Higuchi 2013 ; Månsson et al 2018 ). These differences are largely attributed to the use of different types of single molecule preparations and different details of the force-measurement techniques and analyses (Kaya and Higuchi 2013 ; Månsson et al 2018 ). However, the possibility should also be considered that part of the variation arises because affinity purification has been used in some studies but not in others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest to consider the present results in relation to variability between different single molecule studies in key myosin properties such as step length, actomyosin stiffness and cross-bridge force (Kaya and Higuchi 2013 ; Månsson et al 2018 ). These differences are largely attributed to the use of different types of single molecule preparations and different details of the force-measurement techniques and analyses (Kaya and Higuchi 2013 ; Månsson et al 2018 ). However, the possibility should also be considered that part of the variation arises because affinity purification has been used in some studies but not in others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 27 )). Furthermore, if the elastic properties in single-molecule studies differ from those of the cross-bridges in muscle, this has implications for understanding the constraining effects of the ordered myofilament lattice and/or accessory proteins in the muscle sarcomere ( 38 ). Before more detailed investigations, the first step is to clarify whether the characteristics of the cross-bridge elasticity in muscle really differ from those found in single molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because of lack of detailed modeling of the muscle fiber data under rigor conditions, it is not clear whether the nonlinearity found previously ( 24 ) is consistent with the nonlinearity observed in single molecules ( 29 ). An approach to address these questions is to use “bottom-up” modeling ( 38 ), i.e., to incorporate the nonlinear cross-bridge elastic properties from single-molecule data ( 29 ) into appropriate statistical cross-bridge models ( 5 ) for muscle and then test whether these models account for the muscle properties in rigor as well as under physiological conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Although the authors developed methods to analyze ultrafast force-clamp data [5] , [6] , improvements in data analysis, for example using differential detection between the two trap channels [7] , correlative detection [8] , step detection algorithms [9] , might reveal hidden properties on the acto-myosin interaction. Models of acto-myosin interaction rely to a great extent on single molecule data [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] . Single molecule high-resolution data are therefore fundamental to define and test such models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of acto-myosin interaction rely to a great extent on single molecule data [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] . Single molecule high-resolution data are therefore fundamental to define and test such models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%