2017
DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2016.1260815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do altmetric correlate with citation? : A study based on PLOS ONE journal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding matches with those observed in earlier studies. Furthermore, this finding is in agreement with a study conducted by Syamili & Rekha (2017) which showed altmetrics attentions have a positive correlation with citations. Researchers can further investigate the correlation between citation count and Altmetrics Attention Score in other disciplines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding matches with those observed in earlier studies. Furthermore, this finding is in agreement with a study conducted by Syamili & Rekha (2017) which showed altmetrics attentions have a positive correlation with citations. Researchers can further investigate the correlation between citation count and Altmetrics Attention Score in other disciplines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A study on PLOS one journal revealed that apart from Twitter other altmetrics attentions have a positive correlation with citations (Syamili & Rekha, 2017). Altmetrics measures to evaluate humanities research publications showed similar problems while applying bibliometrics measures to humanities like the prominence of non-journal publications, coverage of non-English language publications, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This score tracks online references to scholarly articles and is determined by the volume of mentions, the sources of mentions, and the authors of mentions. The Altmetric score is a useful indicator of broader interest in the work beyond the academic world and has been suggested to be a predictor of use within the academic world as indicated by subsequent citations (Syamili and Rekha 2017; Thelwall and Nevill 2018; Robinson et al 2021). Moreover, because this score is updated in short increments (i.e., daily), it can provide immediate information on the attention an article is receiving, and how this is changing over time.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, articles with more provocative or attractive titles may have higher online social impact values, and not due to their intrinsic scientific quality (Poplašen & Grgić, 2016). Even within the scientific field there are differences, for example, and articles in the scientific area of social sciences, humanities, medical and life sciences tend to have the highest values (Syamili & Rekha, 2017).…”
Section: Digital Media Social Attention -Altmetricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complementary combination of varied metrics that assess beyond the scientific impact through the number of citations of an article, for example, being aware that what they measure is not the same, emerges as an intrinsic need of rigor in this domain of the kind of individual, but also institutional, impact of the digital scholarly communication (Syamili & Rekha, 2017;Liu & Adie, 2013;Poplašen & Grgić, 2016). Furthermore, there is the need for a quantitative but also a qualitative analysis, in order to have a better understanding of the impact in question, as well as of its reasons (Liu & Adie, 2013).…”
Section: Digital Media Social Attention -Altmetricsmentioning
confidence: 99%