Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may• from the SSRN website:www. SSRN.com • from the RePEc website:www.RePEc.org• from the CESifo website:T www. CESifo-group.org/wpT CESifo Working Paper No. 2524 Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation AbstractWe provide evidence that the robust association between cognitive skills and economic growth reflects a causal effect of cognitive skills and supports the economic benefits of effective school policy. We develop a new common metric that allows tracking student achievement across countries, over time, and along the within-country distribution. Extensive sensitivity analyses of cross-country growth regressions generate remarkably stable results across specifications, time periods, and country samples. In addressing causality, we find, first, significant growth effects of cognitive skills when instrumented by institutional features of school systems. Second, home-country cognitive-skill levels strongly affect the earnings of immigrants on the U.S. labor market in a difference-in-differences model that compares home-educated to U.S.-educated immigrants from the same country of origin. Third, countries that improved their cognitive skills over time experienced relative increases in their growth paths. From a policy perspective, the shares of basic literates and high performers have independent significant effects on growth that are complementary to each other, and the highperformer effect is larger in poorer countries. warranted scepticism about the identification of causal effects remains. We argue that the most significant problem with these analyses has been the valid measurement of skill differences across countries and that, once remedied, a strong case can be made for identification of true causal impacts in more elaborate econometric specifications.As a simple summary observation, world policy attention today focuses on the lagging fortunes of Sub-Saharan Africa and of Latin America. Considerably less attention goes to East Asia, and, if anything, East Asia is proposed as a role model for the lagging regions. Yet to somebody contemplating development policy in the 1960s, none of this would be so obvious.Latin America had average income exceeding that in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and North Africa regions, and both of these exceeded East Asia (see Appendix Table A1).1 Further, Latin America...

Higher Education Input, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth in China

“…Studies have shown that the impact of public education spending on economic growth is nonmonical within a certain range, depending on government investment and construction, expenditure levels, tax structures, and technological production parameters. Research by Hanushek and Woessmann (2012) [9] based on organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD) panel data shows that education can significantly contribute to economic growth. Studies by Barro and Lee (2013) [10] based on the panel data of 146 countries suggests that education plays a significant role in promoting economic growth.…”

An Opportunity to Better Understand Schooling: The Growing Presence of Pisa in the Americas*

“…Although such comparisons between differing national education systems are difficult and challenging, they can be quite useful in deepening our understandings of education (Godard & Smith, 2004). The cost of public education is high, the outcomes are of substantial importance (Hanushek & Woessman, 2009), and it is central that nations identify the best ways to allocate finite resources to education.…”

Innovative Approaches for Growth & Development of Small Businesses & Improve the Poverty Condition in Bangladesh

“…Creation of an effective human nation that increases labor productivity and accelerates return to capital is one of the most important things for the long-term and sustainable development of a nation (Goldin & Katz, 2008;Hanushek & Woessmann, 2012). Education is the single most significant component to create human nation (Goldin & Katz, 2008).…”