2018
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-17-0089.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Climate Change and El Niño Increase Likelihood of Yangtze River Extreme Rainfall?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both intense drought and excessive precipitation are projected to increase towards the middle of the 21st century and this projection is associated with a strengthened relation with ENSO teleconnections. The findings presented here echo the documented effect of El Niño in strengthening the anthropogenic warming-induced increase in summer rainfall elsewhere in the world, such as central China (Yuan et al 2018). Despite the projected increase in precipitation over the SGP, groundwater storage is anticipated to decrease with diminishing groundwater recharge; this is primarily due to the surface warming and projected increase in summer drought that reduces infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Both intense drought and excessive precipitation are projected to increase towards the middle of the 21st century and this projection is associated with a strengthened relation with ENSO teleconnections. The findings presented here echo the documented effect of El Niño in strengthening the anthropogenic warming-induced increase in summer rainfall elsewhere in the world, such as central China (Yuan et al 2018). Despite the projected increase in precipitation over the SGP, groundwater storage is anticipated to decrease with diminishing groundwater recharge; this is primarily due to the surface warming and projected increase in summer drought that reduces infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…FAR is the fractional contribution of human activity to a particular event, and PR is the factor by which the probability of an event has changed under anthropogenic forcing . Bootstrapping was performed 1000 times to estimate the FAR and PR uncertainty (Yuan et al 2018a). To identify the significance level of the difference between ALL and NAT forcings for a given period, p values were calculated using the block bootstrap resampling approach of Singh et al (2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAR is the fractional contribution of human activity to a particular event, and PR is the factor by which the probability of an event has changed under anthropogenic forcing (Ma et al 2017). Bootstrapping was performed 1000 times to estimate the FAR and PR uncertainty (Yuan et al 2018a). To identify the significance level of the difference between ALL and NAT forcings for a given period, p values were calculated using the block bootstrap resampling approach of Singh et al (2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%