2019
DOI: 10.7249/rr2735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Differing Analyses Change the Decision? Using a Game to Assess Whether Differing Analytic Approaches Improve Decisionmaking

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, wargames are not predictive. They can reveal that a certain action is plausible, but cannot definitively predict the course of an actual crisis given the role of chance and the decisions of specific participants (UK MoD 2017, 12-13; Bartels et al 2019). Second, wargames are simplifications of reality (Sabin 2014, 19-30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, wargames are not predictive. They can reveal that a certain action is plausible, but cannot definitively predict the course of an actual crisis given the role of chance and the decisions of specific participants (UK MoD 2017, 12-13; Bartels et al 2019). Second, wargames are simplifications of reality (Sabin 2014, 19-30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%