2014
DOI: 10.1167/14.10.1435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do face and word recognition deficits dissociate? A study of four acquired prosopagnosics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results do not support the prediction that right‐sided lesions causing prosopagnosia would also impair reading . Our finding of intact reading of single words is consistent with 1 prior study of 4 such subjects but conflicts with another of 3 other subjects . However, 2 of the patients with impaired face processing in the latter study were described previously as having visual object agnosia, with perceptual problems that involved more than just faces.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results do not support the prediction that right‐sided lesions causing prosopagnosia would also impair reading . Our finding of intact reading of single words is consistent with 1 prior study of 4 such subjects but conflicts with another of 3 other subjects . However, 2 of the patients with impaired face processing in the latter study were described previously as having visual object agnosia, with perceptual problems that involved more than just faces.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Given that the lateralization of words and faces is only partial, a more specific prediction is that minor deficits for the other stimulus type would be found even after unilateral lesions . One recent study of 3 prosopagnosic subjects and 4 alexic subjects suggested that this was the case, but a study of 5 prosopagnosic subjects found normal word processing in 4 subjects …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation