2006
DOI: 10.1086/501171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Firms Maximize? Evidence from Professional Football

Abstract: This paper examines a single, narrow decision-the choice on fourth down in the National Football League between kicking and trying for a first down-as a case study of the standard view that competition in the goods, capital, and labor markets leads firms to make maximizing choices. Play-by-play data and dynamic programming are used to estimate the average payoffs to kicking and trying for a first down under different circumstances. Examination of actual decisions shows systematic, clear-cut, and overwhelmingly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
122
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
122
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings reveal only that physicians are human. 57 In fact, two of the teams that do well in our evaluation of draft trading (New England and Philadelphia) also try more fourth-down conversions than average, a smart strategy as judged by Romer (2006). 58 Of course it is possible to argue against this critique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such findings reveal only that physicians are human. 57 In fact, two of the teams that do well in our evaluation of draft trading (New England and Philadelphia) also try more fourth-down conversions than average, a smart strategy as judged by Romer (2006). 58 Of course it is possible to argue against this critique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 percent of people who can will end up in the jobs where it's required" (Sharla Stewart, 2005). Romer's (2006) insightful analysis of the decision about whether to punt or "go for it" on 4 th down suggests that NFL coaches are not members of Becker's elite 10 percent. Here we see whether market forces can help NFL owners and general managers to do better.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, professional golfers, playing for large prizes in golf tournaments, show evidence of loss aversion (Pope & Schweitzer, 2011). Professional football coaches, when making decisions about whether to 'go for it' on fourth down, show similar behavior (Romer, 2006). In both cases, golfers (who seem more sensitive to going over par (bogey) than to being under par (birdie)) and football coaches (who avoid the risk of failing to get a first down even when that is, in expectation, the more attractive option), players with high stakes reveal the influence of risk aversion upon their choice behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, not surprisingly, a number of prominent findings in economics have been documented for the first time in sports settings. For instance, without attempting to be exhaustive, Ehrenberg and Bognano (1990) study incentive effects in golf tournaments, Szymanski (2000) studies discrimination using soccer data, Duggan and Levitt (2002) examines corruption in sumo wrestling, Garicano et al (2006) study social pressure as a determinant of corruption in a soccer setting, and Bhaskar (2009) and Romer (2006) study optimal decision making using cricket and football data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%