2021
DOI: 10.3390/vision5010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Grading Gray Stimuli Help to Encode Letter Position?

Abstract: Numerous experiments in the past decades recurrently showed that a transposed-letter pseudoword (e.g., JUGDE) is much more wordlike than a replacement-letter control (e.g., JUPTE). Critically, there is an ongoing debate as to whether this effect arises at a perceptual level (e.g., perceptual uncertainty at assigning letter position of an array of visual objects) or at an abstract language-specific level (e.g., via a level of “open bigrams” between the letter and word levels). Here, we designed an experiment to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we focused on a particular characteristic when playing. It is supposed that when you have played a game several times, you can master it [62,66,67]. However, individual differences can be found with players who usually win and who typically lose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we focused on a particular characteristic when playing. It is supposed that when you have played a game several times, you can master it [62,66,67]. However, individual differences can be found with players who usually win and who typically lose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of that, letter stimuli would additionally be impacted by the flexible nature of letter-specific order encoding, thus accounting for the greater transposition costs for letters compared with other kinds of familiar visual stimuli. Evidence for a perceptual locus for transposed-letter effects [ 21 , 23 , 37 ] does not counter this approach, given that our model includes both a perceptual (location-specific) and an orthographic (location-invariant) locus of such effects (see Fig 1 ). The key characteristic of our approach is that transposed-character effects in same-different matching are driven by both perceptual (i.e., location-specific processing–the 1 st level in Fig 1 ), and higher-level location-invariant processing of order information (the 2 nd level in Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Letter transposition effects have been observed for both adjacent and nonadjacent letter transpositions (one or more intervening letters between the transposed letters; Acha & Perea, 2008; Johnson, 2007; Lupker et al, 2008; Marcet et al, 2019; Perea & Carreiras, 2006a, 2006b, 2008; Perea et al, 2008; Perea & Estevez, 2008; Perea & Fraga, 2006; Perea & Lupker, 2004; Perea et al, 2016; Winskel & Perea, 2013). To examine the flexibility of letter position coding in Latin scripts, some studies have shown that the within-word distance between transposed letters affects the size of TL effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%