Do higher achievers cheat less? An experiment of self-revealing individual cheating

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Do Higher Achievers Cheat Less? An Experiment of Self-Revealing Individual CheatingAPrIl 2017 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5-9 53113 Bonn, Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Email: publications@iza.org www.iza.org IZA -Institute of Labor EconomicsDiscussion PaPer series IZA DP No. 10709 Do Higher Achievers Cheat Less? An Experiment of Self-Revealing Individual CheatingAPrIl 2017 Erez Siniver COMAS Yossef Tobol Jerusalem College of Technology and IZA Gideon YanivAriel University AbstrActAPrIl 2017 IZA DP No. 10709 Do Higher Achievers Cheat Less? An Experiment of Self-Revealing Individual Cheating * The extensive body of survey-based research correlating between students' cheating and their academic grade point average (GPA) consistently finds a significant negative relationship between cheating and the GPA. The present paper reports the results of a tworound experiment designed to expose student cheating at the individual level and correlate it with three intellectual achievement measures: the GPA, the high-school matriculation average grade (MAG) and the psychometric exam score (PES). The experiment involved two classes of third-year economics students incentivized by a competitive reward to answer a multiple-choice trivia quiz without consulting their electronic devices. While this forbiddance was deliberately overlooked in the first round, providing an opportunity to cheat, it was strictly enforced in the second, conducted two months later in the same classes with the sa...

Procrastination And Its Relationship With Business Students’ Cheating Perceptions

“…Bloodgood et al (2010) showed that students scoring high on Machiavellianism were more tolerant of cheating in general compared to other students. Contrary to previous research, Yaniv, Siniver & Tobol (2017) concluded that higher-achieving students were bigger cheaters. Hendy (2017) found that more conscientious students cheated less often compared to less conscientious students.…”

'I Know What I Did Is Wrong, But…': Investigating the Factors of Students' Moral Reasoning (Absenteeism)

“…Furthermore, although the odds of students whose GPA level in 2.01-2,5 was one-third of students whose GPA level bigger than 3.5, it was statistically significant. We have little evidence to state that our findings confirmed the previous research result, i.e., higher achievers are bigger cheaters (Yaniv et al, 2017). This current study indicated that GPA factor was confounded by gender variable, and alternatively, GPA factor increased the effect of gender variable in making the justification for immoral behaviour.…”

“…Most of them have examined this topic within the scope of academic behavior. In the educational environment, immoral behavior such as cheating or plagiarism arises because students 'quality' is only understood and placed on cognitive processes (Cartwright & Menezes, 2014;Yaniv, Siniver, & Tobol, 2017). There is a latent recognition that curriculum deals with cognitive aspects, while extra-curriculum deals with character development.…”

The Adaptive Liar: An Interactionist Approach of Multiple Dishonesty Domains

“…Hilbig & Zettler (2015) underpin these findings by showing that honesty-humility accounted for a large proportion of the variance in dishonest behavior across six experiments that varied in incentive structure, mode of data collection and sample composition. But also more distant individual factors affect cheating, as, for example, Yaniv et al (2017) find that high achievers, measured through students' GPA, tend to cheat more than students with a lower GPA.…”