2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijse.2009.024313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do investors in Spain react to news on sustainability and corporate social responsibility?

Abstract: Abstract:We analyse whether sustainability and corporate social responsibility-related news affects returns of stocks traded on the Spanish stock market. We used event methodology and an approach consistent with the active management of investment portfolios. Results show that in the short term, investors do not consider these news items to be relevant, and they therefore have no effect on the price of the stocks analysed. This result holds when the study is conditioned to the type of news (positive or negativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, our study also contributes to a better understanding of how outside investors react to positive and negative CSR news. Generally, our regression analyses reveal insignificant intercepts for both positive and negative CSR news (Table 2), which is in line with the previous findings of Capelle-Blancard and Petit (2019) and Fernandez-Izquierdo et al (2009). Moreover, our research findings contribute to the disentanglement of the stock market implications of CSR by showing that investors' reactions to such news substantially depend on factors that affect signal credibility (such as family firm status) or determine the signaling environment (i.e., the economic situation) and thus the signal fit (Jaskiewicz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Last, our study also contributes to a better understanding of how outside investors react to positive and negative CSR news. Generally, our regression analyses reveal insignificant intercepts for both positive and negative CSR news (Table 2), which is in line with the previous findings of Capelle-Blancard and Petit (2019) and Fernandez-Izquierdo et al (2009). Moreover, our research findings contribute to the disentanglement of the stock market implications of CSR by showing that investors' reactions to such news substantially depend on factors that affect signal credibility (such as family firm status) or determine the signaling environment (i.e., the economic situation) and thus the signal fit (Jaskiewicz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…What makes CSR news even more interesting from a signaling perspective is that the interpretation of CSR might be ambiguous and context dependent. While negative CSR news has previously been shown to trigger negative (Krüger, 2015) or insignificant (Fernandez-Izquierdo et al, 2009) reactions by investors, the effect of positive CSR news is more complex (e.g., Barnea & Rubin, 2010;Margolis et al, 2009). Some researchers have proposed that managers can "do well by doing good" (e.g., Falck & Heblich, 2007;Fatemi et al, 2015;Flammer & Ioannou, 2015), resulting in a positive market reaction, while others are more pessimistic.…”
Section: Csr As An Important Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Godos-Díaz, Fernández-Gago, & Cabeza-García, 2012;Griffin & Mahon, 1997;López et al, 2007;Martínez-Campillo et al, 2012;Reverte, 2009Reverte, , 2011Waddock & Graves, 1997) and the market value of shares (Black, Carnes, & Richardson, 2000;Callado & Utrero, 2008;Fernández et al, 2009;McGuire et al, 1988;Nieto, Fernández, & Cabeza, 2012;Prado et al, 2008;Roberts & Dowling, 2002).…”
Section: The Second Of Preston and O'bannon's (1997) Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%