The liberalisation of temporary contracts has led to a sizeable share of jobs covered by temporary contracts. This article proposes a matching model of unemployment in which temporary (fixedterm) and permanent (open-ended) jobs coexist in a long-run equilibrium. From the labour demand standpoint, the choice of the type of contract leads to a trade-off between an ex-ante speed of hiring and an ex-post flexible dismissal rate. Empirically, we test with Italian longitudinal data whether nonemployment spells that lead to a temporary job are shorter on average. The empirical evidence strongly supports our theoretical prediction.[ F125 ] 1 In Cahuc and Postel Vinay (2002) temporary and permanent contracts coexist in light of a random and exogenous state permission to fill jobs with temporary contracts. In Blanchard and Landier (2002) all jobs start with a temporary contract and only a fraction is endogenously converted into a permanent job. Garibaldi and Violante (2005) have similar implications. In a more recent article, Cahuc et al. (2012) show that permanent and temporary contracts coexist in a search market with random matching and wage bargaining. With respect to the research of this article, the model by Cahuc et al. does not imply that the job finding rate for temporary workers are larger than the job finding rate for open-ended contracts.2 A similar implication, at least from the labour supply standpoint, emerges in the quantitative general equilibrium model proposed by Alonso-Borrego et al. (2005). The free entry condition in both markets, a key feature of the mechanism of this study, is anyway not modelled by Alonso-Borrego et al.