Do National Green Reputations Matter? The Global Green Economy Index and Implications for Stakeholders in the Green Economy

Tamanini, Jeremy

doi:10.1057/9781137282552_12

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This reaffirms the established understanding that advancements in innovation and green technology lead to enhanced green growth, which subsequently bolsters economic growth (Fernandes et al, 2021;Hussain et al, 2022). Green Some green growth studies overlook social dimension (Nyangchak, 2022;Tamanini & Valenciano, 2016). The emergence of inclusive green growth, inclusive growth, and inclusive development (Jha et al, 2018;Narloch et al, 2016;Rauniyar & Kanbur, 2010;Sun et al, 2020;World Bank, 2012) highlights the absence of social dimension in previous studies addressing sustainable development.…”

Section: Performance and Progress Of Green Growth Dimensions And Pillarssupporting

confidence: 59%

“…Some green growth studies overlook social dimension (Nyangchak, 2022; Tamanini & Valenciano, 2016). The emergence of inclusive green growth, inclusive growth, and inclusive development (Jha et al, 2018; Narloch et al, 2016; Rauniyar & Kanbur, 2010; Sun et al, 2020; World Bank, 2012) highlights the absence of social dimension in previous studies addressing sustainable development.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the last decade, green growth indices, which use composite indices to assess, rank, and compare complex multidimensional concepts that are not immediately measurable, have gained popularity (OECD & JRC, 2008; Becker et al, 2017, 2022). Prominent international organizations developed a plethora of green growth index as sustainable development indicators (Acosta et al, 2019; AfDB, 2014; GGKP, 2013; Jha et al, 2018; OECD, 2017a, 2023; PAGE, 2017; Tamanini & Valenciano, 2016; UNESCAP, 2013; World Bank, 2012). Others introduced a green growth‐ranking system for countries based on their capacity to competitively export intricate green products (Mealy & Teytelboym, 2022); gauged the green growth productivity gap utilizing the Sustainable Society Index (Luukkanen et al, 2019); devised a ranking system and evaluation methodology for green growth indicators in the manufacturing sector by integrating the Combined Compromise Solution (Alrasheedi et al, 2021); monitored the transition toward green growth in developing countries using a set of distinct indicators (Kararach et al, 2018); and evaluated policy‐relevant key indicators crucial to the advancement of green growth (Lyytimäki et al, 2018).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development: A systems thinking on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau in China

Nyangchak

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green growth gained traction as a global climate change strategy and pathway toward sustainable development. China's green growth has been on the rise since the turn of the century, yet it is little understood in the context of its provinces. Previous studies focus on ranking green growth across countries and regions, not on assessing individual provinces over time. This study employs systems thinking and constructs an index framework to assess the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development in Qinghai on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau. The study finds that green growth has steadily increased between 2000 and 2021 despite a volatile growth rate. The 10th–13th Five‐Year Plans showed similar trends. Short‐term green growth performance fluctuated in its dimensions and pillars, while long‐term performance increased steadily. Qinghai is well‐positioned to achieve sustainable development and build a circular economy. The study further discusses sustainable policy implications.

show abstract

Section: Performance and Progress Of Green Growth Dimensions And Pillarssupporting

confidence: 59%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development: A systems thinking on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau in China

Nyangchak

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The current study on the evaluation system mainly included the economic system, social system, environmental system, science and technology system, etc. (Tamanini, 2012;Wang et al, 2021). However, the analysis should be tailored to local conditions instead of directly applying the existing system without consideration.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and obstacle degree analysis of low-carbon development level in Fujian province–based on entropy weight TOPSIS method

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the introduction of “dual carbon” goals of “peaking its carbon emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060" and the gradual promotion of the carbon trading market, it is the main trend to achieve low-carbon and clean development in the future. It is of great practical significance to effectively measure the low-carbon development level and conduct obstacle degree analysis. Based on this, this article aims to investigate the low-carbon development level index of Fujian province from 2006 to 2019 by using the entropy weight TOPSIS model. Then, the key influencing factors are explored by using the obstacle degree model. The results show that the low-carbon development level index of Fujian province shows a fluctuating upward trend, rising from 0.164 in 2006 to 0.803 in 2019. The environmental system has always been an important factor affecting the low-carbon development in Fujian province, with an average annual obstacle degree of 46.52%, but the impact of the other three subsystems is also gradually increasing. Green innovation, energy conservation, air pollution, economic development, and environmental governance are the top five indexes with the highest annual obstacles. Based on the previous results, this article puts forward corresponding policy recommendations, which provide theoretical support for the low-carbon development of Fujian province.

show abstract

How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy?

Sun

Cheng

et al. 2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of China’s low-carbon pilot policy (LCP) is not only to solve the problem of climate change but, more importantly, to achieve the low-carbon transformation of cities. This paper analyzes the industrialization stage’s moderating effect on LCP policy implementation using the difference-in-difference model (DID) with the Low Carbon Development Index (LCDI) as the explained variable. We find that for the low-carbon pilot cities (LCPCs) at the later stage of industrialization, the LCP policy has a positive impact on LCDI, gradually increasing with the study period’s extension. The marginal impact reaches its maximum in the second year after its implementation. For the LCPCs at the middle stage of industrialization, the LCP policy has a weakly negative impact on LCDI. The marginal impact does not change to positive until the fourth year after its implementation. In terms of mechanism analysis, the LCP policy enhances LCDI by slowing down the industrialization process and boosting innovation; the industrialization stage does not constrain the effect. In contrast, the LCP policy’s impact on LCDI by facilitating FDI (Foreign Direct Investment)inflows is strongly influenced by the industrialization stage. For the LCPCs at the later stage of industrialization, the LCP policy can enhance LCDI through FDI. For the LCPCs at the middle stage of industrialization, the LCP policy reduces the inflow of FDI, and the positive effect of FDI on LCDI does not pass the significance test. Thus, this paper argues that a one-size-fits-all strategy to policy implementation should be avoided. Instead, the industrialization stage should be considered a criterion for city classification, and a differentiated target responsibility assessment mechanism should be adopted according to local conditions.

show abstract

Do National Green Reputations Matter? The Global Green Economy Index and Implications for Stakeholders in the Green Economy

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development: A systems thinking on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau in China

Green growth as a pathway toward sustainable development: A systems thinking on the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau in China

Evaluation and obstacle degree analysis of low-carbon development level in Fujian province–based on entropy weight TOPSIS method

How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About