2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
442
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(510 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
442
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our framework provides a reproducible structure to investigators wanting to train, evaluate, and interpret their own ML models to generate hypotheses regarding which OTUs might be biologically relevant. However, deploying microbiome-based models to make clinical diagnoses or predictions is a significantly more challenging and distinct undertaking (41). For example, we currently lack standardized methods to collect patient samples, generate sequence data, and report clinical data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our framework provides a reproducible structure to investigators wanting to train, evaluate, and interpret their own ML models to generate hypotheses regarding which OTUs might be biologically relevant. However, deploying microbiome-based models to make clinical diagnoses or predictions is a significantly more challenging and distinct undertaking (41). For example, we currently lack standardized methods to collect patient samples, generate sequence data, and report clinical data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 Finally, before being integrated into clinical care, a machine learning product needs to be evaluated and validated in a 'silent' mode, "in which predictions are made in real-time and exposed to a group of clinical experts." 14 This period is crucial for finalising workflows and product configurations as well as serving as a temporal validation (Step 2b). An example of a silent mode evaluation is an eCart feasibility study.…”
Section: Evaluate and Validatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning technologies that analysed images were excluded. This review also advances prior work to propose best practices for teams building machine learning models within a healthcare setting 14 and for teams conducting quality improvement work following the learning health system framework. 15 However, there is not a unifying translational path to inform teams beyond success within a single setting to diffuse and scale across healthcare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An interesting observation is the fact that by personalizing the ANNs there is no apparent need to worry about generalization and algorithm fairness, i.e. known and unknown biases related to subject age, weight, and other relevant attributes [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%