2017
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway

Abstract: Educational initiatives targeting staff to reduce restraint must be sensitive towards fluctuating organisational constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Möhler & Meyer , ; Øye et al. ). The main finding from this study was that physical restraint was favoured only in limited circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Möhler & Meyer , ; Øye et al. ). The main finding from this study was that physical restraint was favoured only in limited circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of containment, main evidence, and article classification are described in chart 1. The use of different types of containment (19) was associated with the residential and organizational characteristics of long-stay institutions for the elderly. Being female, and being older than 85 years, were presented as factors which predisposed an individual to the use of physical or chemical restraint.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ndings imply that helping patients with intimate care and other activities of daily living can be troublesome, and often rises ethical challenges regarding coercive interventions. In Norwegian nursing homes, there has been extensive use of coercion and several studies report on how to reduce such practices (54)(55)(56). Coercion or restraint is a common ethical challenge in older people care, and programs aim to enhance care quality by implementing alternative strategies both in nursing homes and in acute care settings (57,58).…”
Section: Meeting Vulnerability Discomfort and Emotional Painmentioning
confidence: 99%