Do patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain due to a temporomandibular disorder show increased attending to somatosensory input at the painful side of the jaw?

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with chronic orofacial pain due to temporomandibular disorders (TMD) display alterations in somatosensory processing at the jaw, such as amplified perception of tactile stimuli, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated one possible explanation, namely hypervigilance, and tested if TMD patients with unilateral pain showed increased attending to somatosensory input at the painful side of the jaw.MethodsTMD patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain (n = 20) and matched healthy volunteers (n = 20) performed a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task indicated which one of two tactile stimuli, presented on each side of the jaw, they had perceived first. TOJ methodology allows examining spatial bias in somatosensory processing speed. Furthermore, after each block of trials, the participants rated the perceived intensity of tactile stimuli separately for both sides of the jaw. Finally, questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain vigilance, were completed.ResultsTMD patients tended to perceive tactile stimuli at the painful jaw side as occurring earlier in time than stimuli at the non-painful side but this effect did not reach conventional levels of significance (p = .07). In the control group, tactile stimuli were perceived as occurring simultaneously. Secondary analyses indicated that the magnitude of spatial bias in the TMD group is positively associated with the extent of fear-avoidance beliefs. Overall, intensity ratings of tactile stimuli were significantly higher in the TMD group than in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the painful and non-painful jaw side in the TMD patients.DiscussionThe hypothesis that TMD patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain preferentially attend to somatosensory information at the painful side of the jaw was not statistically supported, although lack of power could not be ruled out as a reason for this. The findings are discussed within recent theories of pain-related attention.

Occlusal tactile acuity in temporomandibular disorder pain patients: A case‐control study

“…On the other hand, the results agree with the observation that TMD patients have increased somatosensory amplification; compared to healthy controls, they reported more intense tactile sensations to stimuli applied to the skin overlying the masseter or the temporomandibular joint 25 and also displayed a longer‐lasting and earlier cortical activation to such stimuli 26 . Increased tactile acuity was also observed in patients with somatoform disorders who may also report somatosensory distortion, that is a perception bias towards reporting a stimulus as present when it is not 27 .…”

The time course of attentional biases in pain: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies

“…[9; 33; 64; 65], body locations affected by pain e.g. [59], ambiguous somatosensory stimuli e.g. [37] and real, experienced pain e.g.…”

Cognitive biases in pain: an integrated functional–contextual framework

“…This may be even more challenging due to the large heterogeneity in pain samples and common comorbidity with psychopathological disorders, such as anxiety and depression. 46,95 The investigation of cognitive biases using actual pain 53 , pain-relevant body locations 85 , signals of impending pain 9,90 or ambiguous somatosensory stimuli 49 may increase the relevance of pain information. Furthermore, avoiding the use of symbolic pain information (particularly words) reduces the possibility that familiarity with the information (i.e., pain patients more often use pain-related words than healthy persons) can explain cognitive bias findings due to better recall of and altered attention to familiar information.…”