2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do perceived justice and need support of the coach predict team identification and cohesion? Testing their relative importance among top volleyball and handball players in Belgium and Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings reveal that if coaches and athlete leaders increase their competence‐support, team members’ performance is immediately enhanced. This finding corroborates the general literature on how both coaches and athlete leaders can affect performance. However, the present study also provides some novel insights.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings reveal that if coaches and athlete leaders increase their competence‐support, team members’ performance is immediately enhanced. This finding corroborates the general literature on how both coaches and athlete leaders can affect performance. However, the present study also provides some novel insights.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As we have noted, considerable research has applied this approach to the study of fans [73,78,158]. In addition, research has drawn upon social identity theorizing to understand how fans and players deal with changes to a club's overall structure [159], how fans' identification with teams is influenced by the 'unscrupulous' acts of athletes [75], and how identity is formed in teams [160][161][162]. Related research also points to the significance of athletic [163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170] and exercise [171][172][173] identity, and this has fed into research that draws on notions of social identity to understand both exercise behaviour [174] and health behaviour [175], as well as event participation (e.g., in the Gay Games [176]).…”
Section: New Frontiers: Towards a Broader Application Of The Social Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous research (Boen, Vanbeselaere, Brebels, Huybens, & Millet, 2007;Doosje, Ellemers, & Spears, 1995) team identification was measured using the same five items for players and coaches; "Being a member of the team is very important for me", "I am very proud to be a member of this team", "I am very happy that I belong to this team", "I feel very connected with this team", and "I identify strongly with this team". This measure was previously used to assess the team identification of 16-to 36-years old elite level volleyball and handball players and was demonstrated to be a highly internally consistent scale (De Backer et al, 2011). Participants assessed these items on a 7-point scale anchored by -3 (strongly disagree) and 3 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Collective Efficacy and Team Outcome Confidence The Collectmentioning
confidence: 99%