Do Personally Tailored Videos in a Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention Lead to Higher Attention and Recall? – An Eye-Tracking Study

Abstract

Over half of the Australian population does not meet physical activity guidelines and has an increased risk of chronic disease. Web-based physical activity interventions have the potential to reach large numbers of the population at low-cost, however issues have been identified with usage and participant retention. Personalized (computer-tailored) physical activity advice delivered through video has the potential to address low engagement, however it is unclear whether it is more effective in engaging participants when compared to text-delivered personalized advice. This study compared the attention and recall outcomes of tailored physical activity advice in video- vs. text-format. Participants (n = 41) were randomly assigned to receive either video- or text-tailored feedback with identical content. Outcome measures included attention to the feedback, measured through advanced eye-tracking technology (TobiiX 120), and recall of the advice, measured through a post intervention interview. Between group ANOVA’s, Mann–Whitney U tests and chi square analyses were applied. Participants in the video-group displayed greater attention to the physical activity feedback in terms of gaze-duration on the feedback (7.7 vs. 3.6 min, p < 001), total fixation-duration on the feedback (6.0 vs. 3.3 min, p < 001), and focusing on feedback (6.8 vs. 3.5 min, p < 001). Despite both groups having the same ability to navigate through the feedback, the video-group completed a significantly (p < 0.001) higher percentage of feedback sections (95%) compared to the text-group (66%). The main messages were recalled in both groups, but many details were forgotten. No significant between group differences were found for message recall. These results suggest that video-tailored feedback leads to greater attention compared to text-tailored feedback. More research is needed to determine how message recall can be improved, and whether video-tailored advice can lead to greater health behavior change.

Innovative video tailoring for dietary change: final results of the Good for you! cluster randomized trial

“…To our knowledge, no other existing studies have paired tailored written and tailored video materials within the context of a dietary intervention study. The fact that the TW + TV intervention achieved more lasting dietary changes than TW alone may be due to the visual nature of the video intervention creating better attention to the information that led to improved retention [ 50 ]. Alternatively, it could be due to the video intervention providing better motivation for lasting change than just reading the information, or it could be that the combination of the tailored written and tailored video created a synergy where the information in the different media complemented each other and enabled participants to achieve lasting dietary changes.…”

TaylorActive – Examining the effectiveness of web-based personally-tailored videos to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol

“…Videos have been used in previous health behaviour change websites; however their contents have not been tailored to individual recipients, mainly because the videos were merely supporting other intervention components [ 21 – 23 ]. Pilot studies that informed the current study by Soetens et al [ 24 ] and Alley et al [ 25 ], have demonstrated initial efficacy for using tailored videos, with participants in the video group rating the acceptability of the advice significantly higher than those receiving text-based feedback; they also spent significantly more time on the website. However, the methodological limitations of these studies (e.g.…”

Improving self‐perception and self‐efficacy in patients with spinal cord injury: the efficacy of DVD‐based instructions

“…Alley et al . () compared the attention and recall outcomes of tailored physical activity advice in videos vs. the text format with 21 experimental group participants and 20 control group participants. Their results suggested that video‐tailored feedback attracted greater attention than did text‐tailored feedback.…”