2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28675-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Preferences and Beliefs in Dilemma Games Exhibit Complementarity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea was first explored in Martínez-Martínez et al (2015). We present a quantum-like model for preferences and beliefs (QP&B) that replicates the experimental results from Blanco et al (2014) while providing a novel theoretical approach on cognitive dynamics in strategic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This idea was first explored in Martínez-Martínez et al (2015). We present a quantum-like model for preferences and beliefs (QP&B) that replicates the experimental results from Blanco et al (2014) while providing a novel theoretical approach on cognitive dynamics in strategic interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A first example where these new types of projectors on non-orthogonal subspaces have already been constructed and successfully applied was presented in [10] and later expanded upon in [7] (including a successful statistical test against experimental data) . The incentive of constructing them in this paradigm, lay in the emergence of a problematic dimensionality when following the traditional quantum-like course.…”
Section: Qpandb Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we present an idea which also goes beyond orthodox quantumlike techniques. This new technique was originally formulated for a specific setting in [10] and further developed and tested in the recently submitted [7]. In these two papers, a model is constructed which deals with the relationship of a participant's beliefs and preferences in a game theoretic setting, taken from [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%