2021
DOI: 10.1177/00986283211037987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Professor–Student Rapport and Mattering Predict College Student Outcomes?

Abstract: Background: Professor–student rapport and a sense of mattering to others are associated with several college student outcomes, but no study has examined the relation between these two variables. Objective: This study sought to examine associations between professor–student rapport, mattering, and college student outcomes including grade data and students’ ratings of a course and an instructor. Method: 149 college students completed the Professor–Student Rapport Scale (PSRS), the General Mattering Index, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One recent study seems to stand in contrast to these investigations but only on the surface. Shriver and Kulynych (2021) summarized results from their study of 149 college students; they concluded in the abstract of their article that mattering measures were not related to student outcomes. However, their article contains other information indicating that mattering to parents was indeed associated with having a higher grade point average, while greater perceived mattering to their course instructor was linked robustly with student engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent study seems to stand in contrast to these investigations but only on the surface. Shriver and Kulynych (2021) summarized results from their study of 149 college students; they concluded in the abstract of their article that mattering measures were not related to student outcomes. However, their article contains other information indicating that mattering to parents was indeed associated with having a higher grade point average, while greater perceived mattering to their course instructor was linked robustly with student engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the description of these competence levels, teachers experiment with technology, use it for their teaching practice, reflect on its use and suitability for a better experience for their students; at these levels, a training programme is not necessarily required, but rather the desire and motivation of teachers to use technological resources, in addition to the undeniable technological transition that teachers have experienced globally (Bhaumik and Priyadarshini, 2020). However, because of the initial and exploratory nature of technology use, the impact on students is limited, even if it is a joint process of technology discovery (Schriver and Harr, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships between instructors and students that are highly sensitive, friendly, and honest have been described as having “teacher-student rapport” ( Frymier and Houser, 2000 ; Frisby and Martin, 2010 ), and it addresses “the degree to which students feel supported, respected, and valued by their teachers” ( Piechurska-Kuciel, 2011 , p. 85). Therefore, in order to build a solid connection with pupils, instructors should continuously encourage them, respect their opinions, and recognize their academic work ( Schriver and Harr Kulynych, 2021 ). Accordingly, Thornberg et al (2020) made the case that instructors might develop close bonds with their pupils by upholding their academic standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%