Do Regional Trade Areas Improve Export Competitiveness? - A Case of Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia has involved in quite many regional trade agreements, since more than a decade ago. Theoritically, Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are very beneficial to the countries, as resources are more efficiently allocated due to production specialization. However, presence of asymmetric information, market inefficiency, and economic distortion in the real world have led to a deviation of FTAs benefits from its theoritical framework. This paper studies whether Indonesian export competitiveness is improving after Indonesia involves in ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) and ASEAN-Cina Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA). Export competitiveness are measured by some trade indicators, such as: trade intensity index, market share, export product dynamics, and RCA, for some Indonesian main export products. The indices are compared across ASEAN countries and Cina to reveal: (i) which products are gaining or losingcompetitiveness in ASEAN and Cina markets; and (ii) which countries are becoming Indonesian main competitors in ASEAN and Cina markets. Additionally, this paper ends up with some policy recommendations that Indonesia should undertake to improve competitiveness of its products in ASEAN and Cina markets.JEL Classification: R11, F16Keywords: FTA, export competitiveness, Indonesia

Product Competitiveness and Market Penetration in South Sulawesi: Mapping of Leading Export Commodities

“…Most of Indonesia's export products in the Chinese market are categorized as leading retreats and lagging retreats. In the case of ACFTA, Indonesia can improve export performance in the Chinese market (Widyasanti, 2010).…”

Estimating the Impact of ASEAN China Free Trade Agreement on Indonesia’s Trade Balance

“…Most of positive analysis of ACFTA argues that the agreement could raise the level of economic activities and enhance trade creation between member countries by increasing exports in many sectors such as agriculture and manufactured goods (Kurniawati, 2013;Indra Maipita, 2014;Sheng, Tang and Xu, 2014;Yang and Martinez-zarzoso, 2014;Yean, 2014;Indriyani, 2016;Ibrahim, Permata and Ari Wibowo, 2017;Widyasanti, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018). Moreover, many studies have also comprehensively described the positive relation between ACFTA and other economic performance indicators such as GDP growth, investment, and welfare (Lakatos and Walmsley, 2012;Li, Scollay and Maani, 2016;Li and Maani, 2018).…”

“…Since its implementation, the effect of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement has been debated in Indonesia. Some researchers have argued that ACFTA has brought valuable improvements for Indonesian exports, for goods such as plastic, rubber, mineral products, and footwear (Widyasanti, 2017). Meanwhile, other researchers have claimed that ACFTA has decreased the competitiveness of industries and has driven Indonesia from an exportbased to import-based industry (Kurniawati, 2013).…”

The Effect of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) on Indonesia Export

“…Okamoto (2005) found in his research that Singapore and Malaysia gained the advantage of inter and intra-industry specialization, Thailand gain the advantage of intra-industry specialization, while Indonesia and the Philippines is not much gain from trade liberalization. Widyasanti (2010), which examined the impact of competitiveness Indonesia's exports after the ACFTA has the potential to increase exports of Indonesia.…”