2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02036-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do roads or streams explain plant invasions in forested protected areas?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the disturbance hypothesis-more frequent human interference causes the habitat to produce ecological niches suitable for the growth of alien plants and thus promotes invasion. On the other hand, people and vehicles are also carriers of invasive alien plant propagules and therefore act as promoters of invasion [60,61]. Moreover, we also found the average human flow was negatively correlated with the invasibility of all three habitats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This can be explained by the disturbance hypothesis-more frequent human interference causes the habitat to produce ecological niches suitable for the growth of alien plants and thus promotes invasion. On the other hand, people and vehicles are also carriers of invasive alien plant propagules and therefore act as promoters of invasion [60,61]. Moreover, we also found the average human flow was negatively correlated with the invasibility of all three habitats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This caveat applies to other species with dispersal facilitation by human operators of mechanical vectors that are accidental, e.g. recreational boating or vehicle use including off-road vehicles (von der Lippe and Kowarik 2007; Daniels et al 2019).…”
Section: Relevance Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantified risk is more broadly applicable to other AIS, particularly aquatic invasive plants with similar transmission processes such as Brazilian waterweed (Egeria densa) or Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) that are spreading north into a warming Arctic (Kent et al 2018). Our approach is also applicable in other recreation settings including hiking (Liedtke et al 2020), watercraft-related recreation (Leung and Mandrak 2007;Muirhead et al 2009;Kelly et al 2013), or vehicle-related transmission of invasive species (von der Lippe and Kowarik 2007; Daniels et al 2019).…”
Section: Policy Recommendations and Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For managers of large protected areas, this outcome should guide resource prioritization to locations that are major divides between forest and non‐forest rather than predominantly forested locations that are only fragmented by thin linear features such as roads and powerlines. Linear features have been proposed and modeled as likely pathways for invasion (Taylor et al, 2012; von der Lippe & Kowarik, 2012), but recent studies have found poor correlations when assessing the impact beyond the immediate road corridor (Daniels et al, 2019). Our results support the latter studies as total patch edge and distance to non‐forest land uses did show significant correlations with invasion risk but with a strength 10 times less than the land use proportions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%