2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-008-9074-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Spur-Throated Grasshoppers, Melanoplus spp. (Orthoptera: Acrididae), Exert Top-Down Control on Smooth Cordgrass Spartina alterniflora in Northern New England?

Abstract: Recently, strong top-down (consumer) control of cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) has been demonstrated. Here, we manipulated the densities of cordgrass consumers, acridid grasshoppers (Melanoplus bivittatus and Melanoplus femurrubrum), to examine their impact on cordgrass in the Plum Island Estuary (PIE), MA, USA. After 1 month, there was no detectable effect of grasshopper density on S. alterniflora biomass and grasshoppers at the highest densities (34 individuals per square meter) consumed onlỹ 14% of the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Hughes ) and insects (Finke and Denno , Bertness et al. , Johnson and Jessen ) on salt marsh plants have been reported by independent researchers across a large spatial extent in the eastern United States. The generality of top‐down control of plants by herbivores shown in our synthesis is further corroborated by the prevalence of herbivores documented in large‐scale surveys of coastal wetlands (e.g., Farnsworth and Ellison , Silliman and Bortolus , Alberti et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…, Hughes ) and insects (Finke and Denno , Bertness et al. , Johnson and Jessen ) on salt marsh plants have been reported by independent researchers across a large spatial extent in the eastern United States. The generality of top‐down control of plants by herbivores shown in our synthesis is further corroborated by the prevalence of herbivores documented in large‐scale surveys of coastal wetlands (e.g., Farnsworth and Ellison , Silliman and Bortolus , Alberti et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Importantly, a comparison of these characteristics did not identify significant differences between sites (see Appendix for detailed results). We did not monitor herbivore abundance within gardens because grazing is low at these sites (Johnson et al., 2016) and consumer regulation of Spartina is weak in this system (Johnson & Jessen, 2008). In addition, we observed almost no grazing damage on experimental plants, so herbivory is unlikely to differ between sites or among gardens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EOSL is widely used as a proxy for aboveground production, it can underestimate net aboveground production by up to 15% because it does not account for tissue lost due to factors such as herbivory, self‐thinning, or leaf senescence (Nixon and Oviatt ). Herbivory in current‐study marshes, however, is low (Johnson and Jessen ) and seasonal stem loss through self‐thinning is ~10–15% of mid‐August EOSL (Chaisson ). EOSL was estimated for each transect as stem densities standardized to m −2 multiplied by corresponding mean shoot mass as described previously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%