Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients’ First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ardakani, Mojtaba Fattahi; Salehi‐Abargouei, Amin; Sotoudeh, Ahmad; Esmaeildokht, Somayyeh; Bahrevar, Vali

doi:10.31557/apjcp.2020.21.6.1521

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Subjective norms refer to an individual’s perception of social pressures to adopt a specific behavior [ 14 ]. Interestingly, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether subjective norms predict screening of cancer patients’ first-degree relatives [ 40 ]. Investigators found that recommendation from a physician, healthcare provider, or family/friend significantly increased the likelihood of referring for screening and/or preventive measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial

Dwyer

Shen

Zeng

et al. 2021

Genes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic testing is increasingly part of routine clinical care. However, testing decisions may be characterized by regret as findings also implicate blood relatives. It is not known if genetic testing decisions are affected by the way information is presented (i.e., framing effects). We employed a randomized factorial design to examine framing effects on hypothetical genetic testing scenarios (common, life-threatening disease and rare, life-altering disease). Participants (n = 1012) received one of six decision frames: choice, default (n = 2; opt-in, opt-out), or enhanced choice (n = 3, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior). We compared testing decision, satisfaction, regret, and decision cognitions across decision frames and between scenarios. Participants randomized to ‘choice’ were least likely to opt for genetic testing compared with default and enhanced choice frames (78% vs. 83–91%, p < 0.05). Neither satisfaction nor regret differed across frames. Perceived autonomy (behavioral control) predicted satisfaction (B = 0.085, p < 0.001) while lack of control predicted regret (B = 0.346, p < 0.001). Opting for genetic testing did not differ between disease scenarios (p = 0.23). Results suggest framing can nudge individuals towards opting for genetic testing. These findings have important implications for individual self-determination in the genomic era. Similarities between scenarios with disparate disease trajectories point to possible modular approaches for web-based decisional support.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial

Dwyer

Shen

Zeng

et al. 2021

Genes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, numerous studies in both developed and developing countries documented that greater social support promotes breast cancer screening adherence (Smalls et al, 2018;Documet et al, 2015;Leyva et al, 2015;Donnelly et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2012). Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that injunctive norms (i.e., physician recommendation, and family and friends recommendation) increased the motivation to undergo cancer screening among cancer patients' first-degree relatives (Fattahi Ardakani et al, 2020).…”

Section: Socioemotional Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paving the road for early breast cancer presentation

Dewi¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Impact of Attitude and Subjective Norm on Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour Among the Non-Academic Staff: Behavioural Intention as a Mediating Variable

Eletter

Kaba

Ramaiah

et al. 2023

J. Info. Know. Mgmt.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this study is to understand the attitude of non-academic staff towards knowledge sharing. Additionally, this study investigates the potential factors that might affect knowledge sharing among the non-academic staff. This is a cross-sectional study of 467 non-academic staff from two universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and India. The findings show that male participants are more involved in knowledge-sharing behaviour ([Formula: see text]) than the female participants ([Formula: see text]); participants aged 50 years and above recorded the highest knowledge-sharing behaviour ([Formula: see text]); participants with non-managerial positions appeared to be more involved in knowledge-sharing behaviour ([Formula: see text]) than those with managerial positions; and finally, the participants from Indian university reported more involvement in knowledge-sharing behaviour ([Formula: see text]) than their UAE counterparts ([Formula: see text]). The findings of the study revealed a significant relationship between attitude towards knowledge sharing, subjective norm and knowledge-sharing behaviour ([Formula: see text]). In addition, the study explored the mediating role of behavioural intentions within the previous variables. The findings stressed that management in higher education institutions needs to foster a culture of knowledge sharing to encourage non-academic staff to share knowledge.

show abstract

Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients’ First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial

Framing Effects on Decision-Making for Diagnostic Genetic Testing: Results from a Randomized Trial

Paving the road for early breast cancer presentation

The Impact of Attitude and Subjective Norm on Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour Among the Non-Academic Staff: Behavioural Intention as a Mediating Variable

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About