2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1379-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the best scholars attract the highest speaking fees? An exploration of internal and external influence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only aspects of value about awards may be considered to be the ancillary income. It has been empirically shown, for instance, that recipients financially profit from having been awarded a major book prize (Chan et al ., ; Ponzo and Scoppa, ). Awards can also improve the health of their recipients.…”
Section: The Academic Study Of Awardsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only aspects of value about awards may be considered to be the ancillary income. It has been empirically shown, for instance, that recipients financially profit from having been awarded a major book prize (Chan et al ., ; Ponzo and Scoppa, ). Awards can also improve the health of their recipients.…”
Section: The Academic Study Of Awardsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chan et al . () use the synthetic control method (Abadie and Gardeazabal, ) to construct a control group for every award winner that mirrors his or her performance and career path before the award conferral. Comparing the winners' subsequent academic performance trajectory to that of the control group, which represents the counterfactual scenario of no award receipt, allows identifying whether winning the award raised research productivity and professional status.…”
Section: Effects Of Awardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Clark Medalists and newly elected Econometric Society Fellows, Chan et al (2014a) estimate double-differences between them and arguably comparable economists pre-and post-selection/election. The awardees/winners generate more and better subsequent citations than the control group, and even more citations per publication.…”
Section: Judging Editorial and Committee Decisions By Subsequent Citamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 1 For a quantitative analysis of the outside dimension, see Whyte (2013, 2014). 2 For more recent studies, see Watts and Gilbert (2011) for an agent-based simulation, and Azoulay et al (2014) and Chan, Frey, Gallus and Torgler (2014a) for the citation patterns of papers published before the bestowal of an award. Although both these latter construct synthetic counterfactuals with the same preaward citation structure, Azoulay et al (2014) observe only a small citation boost over a short period because of the award, while Chan, Frey, Gallus and Torgler (2014b) observe a very large and long-lasting effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%