2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the variable charges really increase the effectiveness and economy of waste management? A case study of the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2013, the waste management fee in Aschaffenburg was lower than the fee before 1997 (Figure 9)-despite the additional activities and equipment associated with PAYT implementation (including the separate collection of the different fractions, the erection of facilities to recycle or to recover waste streams, weighing equipment, etc.). This fee reduction proves that weight-based PAYT is not necessarily a more expensive waste management option than others, contrary to some studies [28]. However, waste management costs vary greatly from one municipality to another and over time, based on a multitude of factors.…”
Section: Economic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In 2013, the waste management fee in Aschaffenburg was lower than the fee before 1997 (Figure 9)-despite the additional activities and equipment associated with PAYT implementation (including the separate collection of the different fractions, the erection of facilities to recycle or to recover waste streams, weighing equipment, etc.). This fee reduction proves that weight-based PAYT is not necessarily a more expensive waste management option than others, contrary to some studies [28]. However, waste management costs vary greatly from one municipality to another and over time, based on a multitude of factors.…”
Section: Economic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Fullerton and Kinnaman [26], Miranda et al [17] argued that the effect of waste charge on household behavior and reduction of municipal waste is clear while Slavik and Pavel [27] pointed out that the effect of waste charge and economic instruments must not be overrated because other factors except economic instrument affects household behavior a lot. Frey and Oberholzer-Gee [28] and Frey and Jegen [29] empirically showed that the effect of economic incentive instruments can be reduced in consequence of the crowding out effect.…”
Section: Waste Charge In Waste Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frey and Oberholzer-Gee [28] and Frey and Jegen [29] empirically showed that the effect of economic incentive instruments can be reduced in consequence of the crowding out effect. In addition, Slavik and Pavel [27] criticized the limitation of data previous studies used and irrelevance of methodology that cannot cover deficiency of limited data. Specifically, they argued that most of the previous studies using community level data could not include relevant community characteristics.…”
Section: Waste Charge In Waste Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The practical realization of waste management differentiates economical and efficiency view. Based on scientific research [10] it was shown that the variable charges can be considered as an effective choice for the waste management regulation; the effectiveness of variable charges is greater than the effectiveness of fixed fees. Unfortunately, as the authors concluded, the key question for local representatives in the Czech Republic is not the effectiveness but the economy of waste management fees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%