2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055405051919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance

Abstract: M uch recent research has found that states generally comply with the treaties they sign. The implications of this finding, however, are unclear: do states comply because the legal commitment compels them to do so, or because of the conditions that led them to sign? Drawing from previous research in this Review on Article VIII of the IMF Treaty (Simmons 2000a), I examine the problem of selection bias in the study of treaty compliance. To understand how and whether international legal commitments affect state b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
168
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
168
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Absent participation enforcement, countries should only agree to become signatories if they expect that they will be able to comply with their commitments (Downs et al 1996;von Stein 2005). If complying is prohibitively costly, and if the IEA does not enforce participation, it seems reasonable to expect that countries would decline to ratify the IEA.…”
Section: What Characterizes Potent Enforcement?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absent participation enforcement, countries should only agree to become signatories if they expect that they will be able to comply with their commitments (Downs et al 1996;von Stein 2005). If complying is prohibitively costly, and if the IEA does not enforce participation, it seems reasonable to expect that countries would decline to ratify the IEA.…”
Section: What Characterizes Potent Enforcement?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratification is quite obviously not random either. Methods exist to address endogeneity and selection, but they involve trade-offs and are highly imperfect (Simmons & Hopkins 2005;von Stein 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a followup study, von Stein (2005) argues that screening effects, rather than constraining effects, could easily account for Simmons' results-that is, that states preferentially opt in to treaties with which they are already willing to comply. She also underscores the endogeneity of Article VIII status and argues that unmeasured confounders-that is, variables that have an impact both on commitment and compliance-are potentially problematic for Simmons' results.…”
Section: The Impact Of International Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrubba, Yuen and Zorn 2007), selection bias (Sartori, 2003;von Stein, 2005;Boehmke, Morey and Shannon, 2006;Chiba, Martin and Stevenson, 2014), split-population or partial-observability models (Xiang, 2010;Braumoeller and Carson, 2011), zero-inflated or rare events data (King and Zeng, 2001;Bagozzi, Hill, Moore and Mukherjee, 2015), network analysis (Dorussen and Ward, 2008;Hafner-Burton and Kahler, 2009;Maoz, 2009;Cranmer, Desmarais and Menninga, 2012), and more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%