1978
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.43.4.485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do vasomotor nerves significantly regulate cerebral blood flow?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, 1982) and exert a protec tive effect against breakthrough of autoregulation of CBF during acute hypertension (Bill and Linder, 1976). However, the role of the sympathetic nerves in the regulation of the resting CBF is still disputed Purves, 1978). This controversy seems to depend partly on the method ological limitations of measuring CBF and on the homeostatic mechanism of cerebral circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, 1982) and exert a protec tive effect against breakthrough of autoregulation of CBF during acute hypertension (Bill and Linder, 1976). However, the role of the sympathetic nerves in the regulation of the resting CBF is still disputed Purves, 1978). This controversy seems to depend partly on the method ological limitations of measuring CBF and on the homeostatic mechanism of cerebral circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies are considered to retlect species differences in the experimental animals (Heistad et al. 197ts) and methodological limitations in the measurement of CBF (Purves. 1978: Lacombe et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of nerve supplies to the pial, dural, and intracerebral blood vessels is well known, but their role in the regulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been a matter of speculation and debate over much of this century (Wolff, 1936;Lassen, 1959;Sokoloff, 1959;Owman and Edvinsson, 1977;Heistad and Marcus, 1978;Kuschinsky and Wahl, 1978;Purves, 1978;Owman and Hardebo, 1986;Lou et aI., 1987;Edvinsson et aI., 1993). The most widely accepted view has been that CBF is regu-( + 31 %), and frontal cortices (+ 56%) and the caudate putamen ( + 27%) above control values (n = 9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on various aspects of cerebrovascular responses (Purves, 1972) and several improvements of the classical technique have been made (Forbes, 1928;Gurdjian et aI., 1958;Wahl et aI., 1973;Harper and MacKenzie, 1977;Auer and Haydn, 1979;Okayasu et aI., 1979). This method, however, has yielded only indirect information about the level of the blood flow (Purves, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%