2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we map remembrances to the left/back and expectations to the right/front of a mental timeline? Space–time congruency effects with retrospective and prospective verbs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the level time is task irrelevant suggest a systematic variation of the effect size depending on the type of temporal stimuli: Single sentences (e.g., The witness remembers the pistol‐shot, Maienborn et al., ) and discourses with small time shifts (e.g., Jackie is taking a painting class; Tomorrow, she will learn about paintbrushes […], Sell & Kaschak, ) show no effect, whereas discourses with large time shifts (e.g., Jackie is taking a painting class; Next month, she will learn about paintbrushes […], Sell & Kaschak, ) yield an ample effect. Hence, whether or not the mental timeline is activated automatically seems to depend on whether or not the temporal order information can be processed without using the mental timeline as part of the build‐up of a situation model (Scheifele et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the level time is task irrelevant suggest a systematic variation of the effect size depending on the type of temporal stimuli: Single sentences (e.g., The witness remembers the pistol‐shot, Maienborn et al., ) and discourses with small time shifts (e.g., Jackie is taking a painting class; Tomorrow, she will learn about paintbrushes […], Sell & Kaschak, ) show no effect, whereas discourses with large time shifts (e.g., Jackie is taking a painting class; Next month, she will learn about paintbrushes […], Sell & Kaschak, ) yield an ample effect. Hence, whether or not the mental timeline is activated automatically seems to depend on whether or not the temporal order information can be processed without using the mental timeline as part of the build‐up of a situation model (Scheifele et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is yet an alternative explanation for the dispersal of the level time is task irrelevant : The discrepant results of its additional subdivision reflect the current discussion about the automatic activation of the mental timeline (Scheifele et al., ). Most studies fail to find a space–time congruency effect when time is not a relevant response dimension (Maienborn et al., ; Ulrich & Maienborn, ; Ulrich et al., ). However, Sell and Kaschak () reported an automatically activated mental timeline for discourses containing large time shifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, a more general account of spatially organized knowledge representations suggests that spatial-conceptual mappings should not be limited to the number domain. Indeed, similar lateral biases were found in concepts denoting time (Hartmann & Mast, 2012;Ishihara, Keller, Rossetti, & Prinz, 2008;Maienborn, Alex-Ruf, Eikmeier, & Ulrich, 2015), music and sound (Dormal, Dormal, Joassin, & Pesenti, 2012;Marghetis, Walker, Bergen, & N uñez, 2011;Rusconi, Kwan, Giordano, Umilta, & Butterworth, 2006;Xuan, Zhang, He, & Chen, 2007), and political preferences (Sellaro, Hommel, de Kwaadsteniet, van de Groep, & Colzato, 2014). One theory that offers a detailed overview of a potential neuro-cognitive mechanism supporting such spatial-conceptual features of concept representations is A Theory of Magnitude (ATOM; Walsh, 2003Walsh, , 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%