1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00245-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we need two pomerons?

Abstract: We show that one single Pomeron compatible with the Froissart limit, can account for all the present HERA data.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that (19) does not depend on x, in general an effective intercept does not coincide with x-slope.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that (19) does not depend on x, in general an effective intercept does not coincide with x-slope.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a two pomerons model [18] and other models were proposed which smoothly interpolate between a soft and a hard Q 2 −dependence [19] or combine these behaviours [20]. Of course, such a picture for the pomeron does not correspond to a true Regge singularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, there is only one Pomeron in the nature [4]: nevertheless, for the sake of completeness, we have included in our analysis the above parametrization as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models to cope with the above requirements have been suggested [20,21,22]. At HERA, especially at large Q 2 , scaling is so badly violated that it may not be explicit anymore.…”
Section: Q 2 − Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Veneziano, or resonance-reggeon, duality [5] and Bloom-Gilman, or hadron-parton, duality [6] in strong interactions the residue is chosen to satisfy approximate Bjorken scaling for the structure function [20,21]. Assuming the Reggeon (or Pomeron) exchange to be a simple pole, the residue function obeys the factorization property: it is a product of two vertices -the γγR(P ) and N N R(P ), where N stands for the nucleon (see Fig.…”
Section: Notation and Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%