2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2012.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Documento de consenso sobre etiología, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la otitis media aguda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important that we not only know how attending childcare influences contracting the pathologies under study, but also how it influences the number of episodes suffered, so we calculated the difference between the cohort means, and found significant differences for several of these pathologies: bronchiolitis, bronchitis, conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, acute otitis media, common cold, and wheezing. Still, the study of recurrent otitis in particular did not contribute definitive data; in accordance with the definition included in the consensus document on otitis media 11 , the presence of at least three episodes of otitis within six months was considered recurrent otitis. In the age range under study (6 to 12 months), only four children who did not attend childcare met these criteria (0.4%) presenting a maximum of four episodes, and among those who did attend childcare, another four met the criteria (3.4%), although they suffered a higher number of episodes, up to a total of eight in this span of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that we not only know how attending childcare influences contracting the pathologies under study, but also how it influences the number of episodes suffered, so we calculated the difference between the cohort means, and found significant differences for several of these pathologies: bronchiolitis, bronchitis, conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, acute otitis media, common cold, and wheezing. Still, the study of recurrent otitis in particular did not contribute definitive data; in accordance with the definition included in the consensus document on otitis media 11 , the presence of at least three episodes of otitis within six months was considered recurrent otitis. In the age range under study (6 to 12 months), only four children who did not attend childcare met these criteria (0.4%) presenting a maximum of four episodes, and among those who did attend childcare, another four met the criteria (3.4%), although they suffered a higher number of episodes, up to a total of eight in this span of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary end point was the frequency of an otitis-related pathogen carriage in the external auditory canal. The inclusion criteria were at least four episodes of AOM during the preceding 12 months or at least three episodes during the preceding 6 months [ 52 ]. The exclusion criteria included chronic medication, chronic illnesses, lip or palatal cleft, programmed tympanostomy or adenoidectomy during the study, and lactose intolerance or cow’s milk protein allergy (because of the excipient used to administer the strain).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A physical examination was performed by a pediatrician for each suspected AOM episode. AOM was diagnosed according to defined clinical criteria [ 52 , 53 ], including evidence of middle ear effusion, inflammation of the tympanic membrane and any other sign of an acute infection (fever, ear ache, otorrhoea, etc.). The number of AOM episodes and the duration of each episode were also recorded and compared to the same data obtained in the 6 months preceding the probiotic treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justificación: la OMA en la infancia es una de las enfermedades más frecuentes y la principal causa de prescripción de antibióticos en los países desarrollados. En varias Guías y Consensos se está generalizando la recomendación de retrasar el tratamiento con antibióticos de 48 a 72 horas en niños mayores de tres años, si el cuadro clínico no es grave [2][3][4][5] . En el grupo de menores de tres años hay diferencias sobre la decisión de iniciar el tratamiento.…”
Section: Comentario Críticounclassified
“…La Guía NICE, la Revisión Cochrane y la nueva guía de la Academia Americana de Pediatría 3,5,6 recomiendan una conducta de tratamiento diferido en niños en los que se pueda asegurar el seguimiento y no tengan clínica grave, otitis bilateral y otorrea. Otro grupo de guías, como en España el reciente consenso de la OMA 4 , recomiendan el antibiótico desde el inicio. Son necesarios más estudios para establecer cuáles de estos pacientes pueden beneficiarse de un tratamiento diferido.…”
Section: Comentario Críticounclassified