2017
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does 3T Fetal MRI Improve Image Resolution of Normal Brain Structures between 20 and 24 Weeks' Gestational Age?

Abstract: Both magnets depict cerebral and facial normal anatomic structures; however, our data indicates better anatomic detail on the 3T than on the 1.5T magnet.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 3 sets of single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted images were acquired in each plane, with FOVs of 256 Â 256 or 320 Â 320. The multiplanar single-shot fast spin-echo images were processed using a previously validated fetal MR imaging processing pipeline, 25 which involved a section-to-volume reconstruction algorithm 26 that generated motion-corrected, intensity-normalized, super-resolution 3D volumes with 0.75-mm isotropic voxels in the scanner (world) coordinates and registration to a normative spatiotemporal MR imaging atlas of the fetal brain for review in standard anatomic planes. The reconstructed images were thus reviewed in standard anatomic planes to minimize variations in scoring due to slight differences in the orientation of the fetus or the position of the mother.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 3 sets of single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted images were acquired in each plane, with FOVs of 256 Â 256 or 320 Â 320. The multiplanar single-shot fast spin-echo images were processed using a previously validated fetal MR imaging processing pipeline, 25 which involved a section-to-volume reconstruction algorithm 26 that generated motion-corrected, intensity-normalized, super-resolution 3D volumes with 0.75-mm isotropic voxels in the scanner (world) coordinates and registration to a normative spatiotemporal MR imaging atlas of the fetal brain for review in standard anatomic planes. The reconstructed images were thus reviewed in standard anatomic planes to minimize variations in scoring due to slight differences in the orientation of the fetus or the position of the mother.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the signal-to-noise ratio at 3 Tesla is nearly two times as high as with 1.5 Tesla, which can either be used to improve image quality or to reduce scan time [13, 14]. This potential benefit of high-field MRI has also been proven for imaging the cerebellum in the late second trimester despite the challenge of additional artefacts [12]. In our own experience, fetal MRI at 3 Tesla enabled us to exclude more severe vermian hypoplasia with higher confidence already at 21 weeks‘gestation, thus, following ultrasound screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fetal MRI, switching to higher field strength requires adapted imaging sequences, handling of artefacts, and a limitation of the specific absorption rate to 4 W/kg for maternal whole-body exposure [11]. Superior image resolution at 3 Tesla as compared to 1.5 Tesla has recently been proven for a number of brain structures including the cerebellum between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation [12]. Follow-up imaging at a later gestational age most probably further increases diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are unable to ascertain whether exam accuracy is superior using images acquired using 3 T scanners. In a study [ 7 ] performed to evaluate brain structures in fetuses imaged at 3 T compared to 1.5 T significantly better anatomic resolution of posterior fossa structure was obtained with the 3 T magnet. However, for the other structures assessed in the supratentorial compartment, there were no significant differences in images obtained with the 1.5 or 3 T magnets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some articles describe 3 T MRI for body fetal imaging, but data regarding the caveats of imaging the fetal brain are scarce [ 7 , 8 ] 3T MRI has promising results in terms of better depiction of small anatomic structures (like inner ear and posterior fossa), although some disadvantages as increased magnetic field heterogeneity and standing wave artifacts have been described. [ 7 , 8 ] The scarce literature on the specific application of 3 T MRI in the study of the fetal brain, in which encouraging results in terms of quality of imaging are balanced against inconveniences such as artifacts, prompted us to report our preliminary experience in cerebral fetal 3 T MRI. We used a 3-tiered approach to describe our experience: feasibility, time of acquisition, and possibility to establish a diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%