2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-021-04776-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does bait type and bait container configuration influence the performance of remote underwater video systems in temperate freshwater lakes for assessing fish community structure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opinicon Lake has an abundance of fish, and as such, the recordings commonly contained images of fish. However, such data are also inherently variable (e.g., Glassman et al, 2022) with sampling instances in which no fish were observed. The statistical analysis revealed some variation in fish presence and diversity between recordings at different sites but none that was clearly linked to device operation and EMF transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Opinicon Lake has an abundance of fish, and as such, the recordings commonly contained images of fish. However, such data are also inherently variable (e.g., Glassman et al, 2022) with sampling instances in which no fish were observed. The statistical analysis revealed some variation in fish presence and diversity between recordings at different sites but none that was clearly linked to device operation and EMF transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The units were then tethered to cinder block anchors and yellow marker buoys with nylon nautical rope and deployed for 1‐h observation periods at different points (1‐ to 3‐m depth) separated by at least 300 m around the shores of Opinicon Lake. From the videos, we extracted still frames at 30‐s intervals, counted the number of fish visible in those frames, and identified them to at least the Family level or genus or species whenever possible (as per Glassman et al, 2022) to determine if the EMFs influenced space use by wild, free‐swimming fishes in their natural habitat. We recorded a total of N = 51 videos consisting of N = 25 treatment (EMF device activated) and N = 26 control (EMF device off) trials conducted at midday to maximize light availability and underwater viewing range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glassman et al compared the effectiveness of three types of bait and two types of bait containers on bait free systems. The results indicate that BRUVS is effective in observing species richness in shallow and low visibility freshwater environments, but there is almost no evidence to suggest that the use of bait improves the effectiveness compared to non-bait RUVS [7]. Zhang et al proposed an end-to-end dual generator model DuGAN on the grounds of generative adversarial networks for enhancing underwater images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It performs power operations on the channel equations to obtain a moderate compensation space, as shown in Eq. (7).…”
Section: B Improvement Of Underwater Video Image Restoration On the G...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of BRUVs in marine environments is common, but less common in freshwater systems (Whitmarsh et al, 2017). BRUVs have been used to assess species richness (Ebner & Morgan, 2013), abundance, condition and size in freshwater fish (Glassman et al, 2022), trap avoidance and behaviour in freshwater crayfish (O'Hea Miller et al, 2023; Skorulis et al, 2021), and abundance of freshwater turtles, caimans and dolphins (Schmid & Giarrizzo, 2019). Whilst BRUVs have been shown to be useful for relative abundance estimates for some freshwater turtle species, there is a need to refine BRUV use (Schmid & Giarrizzo, 2019) and compare effectiveness with active methods used for freshwater turtle monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%