2021
DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.14376434.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does citizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? An empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform

Abstract: With contemporary development of digital technology and smart cities initiatives, citizen co-production has created a new government-citizen interface. However, it remains inconclusive whether such citizen-government collaboration has achieved the fundamental goal of improving service quality for citizens. In this research, we tested the relationship between e-participation as a form of co-production and service performance, using multiple large longitudinal datasets from a smart city mobile platform. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey adds provision of an extensive set of full-featured smart urban services, responsiveness and transparency of the services, and maintenance of data security and privacy as additional factors being crucial to SC success. Astonishingly, the respondents deem participatory elements of little importance for SC implementation contradicting the statements of Allen et al (2020) and Cardullo and Kitchin (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey adds provision of an extensive set of full-featured smart urban services, responsiveness and transparency of the services, and maintenance of data security and privacy as additional factors being crucial to SC success. Astonishingly, the respondents deem participatory elements of little importance for SC implementation contradicting the statements of Allen et al (2020) and Cardullo and Kitchin (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…With regard to the expected benefits, the study finds that cost, time and savings in C2G interaction are the most important motivation for citizens whereas unconstrained access to public service usage, immediate feedback concerning queries as well as multichannel interaction and interoperability also provide important benefits. Since it remains unclear how citizen engagement may improve public smart services in SCs, Allen et al (2020) show that the frequency of feedback provided by the users induced a higher clearance rate of public service inquiries in subdistrinct service units in general. Finally, in order to clarify the value created by ICT-based public services, El-Haddadeh et al (2019) surveyed 313 citizens in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: State Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results of our study also contrast with the tentative conclusions of observational studies about citizen reporting and the coproduction of services. Both Sjoberg, Mellon and Peixoto (2017) and Allen et al (2019) find evidence that some cities have made real efforts to respond to citizen reporting. While it is clear that many governments are attempting such approaches, the aggregate results of our study point to the importance of establishing clear counterfactual designs for research about impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its advantage lies in helping citizens overcome cognitive limitations via interactions (Palenchar & Heath, 2007). Compared with single linear risk communication, TWRC emphasizes engagement, feedback, interaction, and cooperation (Allen et al, 2020). It allows citizens to digest policy goals and prospects via diversified interactions and dialogues (Weaver, 2014).…”
Section: Ac Twrc and Citizens’ Pcwmentioning
confidence: 99%