2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.285338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Commerce Clause Review have Perverse Effects?

Abstract: noting one assumption underlying United States v. Lopez is that Court favors "significant decentralization"). In Brickey's view, Lopez counters the congressional trend towards federalizing traditionally state-controlled acts by serving as a "reminder that, contrary to contemporary thought, congressional power under the Commerce Clause is not unlimited, that states have primary authority to define and enforce criminal laws, and that much of what Congress has enacted needlessly alters the balance between federal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The authors find that the murder rate is significantly reduced by both death sentences and executions. The most striking finding is that on average, each execution results in 18 fewer murders.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The authors find that the murder rate is significantly reduced by both death sentences and executions. The most striking finding is that on average, each execution results in 18 fewer murders.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[T]he avoidance of assaults upon the defenseless is not the only, or even in all cases an overriding, moral consideration." 17 Shue then adduces a string of brief empirical and institutional arguments against permitting coercive interrogation. First, it will be difficult to define the limited set of conditions under which coercive 13 We do not claim that only institutional considerations can justify a threshold-based approach -for example, a norm against killing that can be overridden to save 100 lives, but not 2 lives.…”
Section: First-order Considerations: Moral Limits On Coercive Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now have a statutory, administrative, and judicial system to evaluate public access demands-including the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 12 the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 13 the Government in the Sunshine Act, 14 the Presidential Records Act, 15 the Federal Records Act, 16 and the Executive Order on classified information. 17 Federal courts regularly use such material to adjudicate access disputes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%