2020
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.8874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Corporate Governance Structures Predict Firm’s Market Value? Empirical Evidence From Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the research (Indriastuti and Kartika, 2021;Ahulu and MacCarthy, 2020;Phuong and Hung, 2020;Masitha and Djuminah, 2019) explain the significant positive relationship of the board of directors on corporate value, this is because in the company there will always have a conflict between the directors and shareholders. Thus, the board of directors was formed as a mechanism to monitor the activities of the company's directors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the research (Indriastuti and Kartika, 2021;Ahulu and MacCarthy, 2020;Phuong and Hung, 2020;Masitha and Djuminah, 2019) explain the significant positive relationship of the board of directors on corporate value, this is because in the company there will always have a conflict between the directors and shareholders. Thus, the board of directors was formed as a mechanism to monitor the activities of the company's directors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The research of Ahulu and MacCarthy (2020) revealed that board size and corporate value have a significant positive relationship. This relationship is aligned with the theory of agency and GCG guidelines that separate which CEO position from the chairman of the board position will be impacted the performance of realizing maximum corporate value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total score of seven indicates a higher CG practice and a minimum score of 0 indicates that the firm does not comply with corporate governance practice. We expect a positive relationship between corporate governance and the bank's performance (Claessens & Yurtoglu, 2013;Love, 2011;Ahulu & MacCarthy, 2020). According to Rajagopalan and Zhang (Rajagopalan & Zhang, 2008), good corporate governance practices reduce agency costs, minimize information asymmetry, lower capital costs, build trust for the stakeholders, and improve a firm's performance.…”
Section: Control Variables (Ie Size and Growth)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that many corporate governance experts find CEO duality an undesirable practice, many studies have found a negative relationship between ACI and the firm performance (…), even though there are some mixed outcomes in the literature. The separation of the position provides an opportunity to assess independently the performance of the CEO and the executive management to require better accountability from management (Ahulu & MacCarthy, 2019;Monks & Minow, 2004). The study equates a CEO-non-duality variable as "0" and when the CEO also serves as the Board Chairman else "1" if the position is handled by different persons.…”
Section: Independent Variables (Ie Aci Ceo Bsize and Ned)mentioning
confidence: 99%