2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?

Abstract: This paper assesses the relationship between the impact of corruption on growth and investment and the quality of governance in a sample of 63 to 71 countries between 1970 and 1998. Like previous studies, we find a negative effect of corruption on both growth and investment. Unlike previous studies, we find that corruption has a negative impact on growth independently from its impact on investment. These impacts are, however, different depending on the quality of governance. They tend to worsen when indicators… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
546
2
28

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 821 publications
(608 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
32
546
2
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we find inspiration from a large literature on corruption that undermines the strength of public institutions and hampers economic growth and development (and vice-versa). Classical references include Shleifer and Vishny (1993), Mauro (1995), Bardhan (1997) and Meon and Sekkat (2005). Our work is also related to the empirical analyses that use microdata to investigate the determinants of corruption (Swamy et al, 2001;Svensson, 2003;Mocan, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we find inspiration from a large literature on corruption that undermines the strength of public institutions and hampers economic growth and development (and vice-versa). Classical references include Shleifer and Vishny (1993), Mauro (1995), Bardhan (1997) and Meon and Sekkat (2005). Our work is also related to the empirical analyses that use microdata to investigate the determinants of corruption (Swamy et al, 2001;Svensson, 2003;Mocan, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less political constraint and longer legitimate tradition also decrease the potential for bribery. Interestingly, faster growing GDP results in more briberies; this growth paradox clearly contradicts the traditional studies (Keefer and Knack, 1997;Campos et al, 1999;Kaufmann and Wei, 1999;Méon and Sekkat, 2005) which argues corruption hinders a country's development. The turmoil during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis increased the probability that firms will bribe.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…One strand of the literature suggests that corruption trend to take place in a transition economy with a low quality of governance and can, therefore, reduce the inconvenience of such a transition economy. This view claims that corruption is like "grease" for a firm's innovation [15] and helps companies to overcome bureaucratic processes, complex market access regulations and improve their entry strategies and investment selections. Another strand stresses that corruption is the "sand" for a firm's growth.…”
Section: Innovation and Corruption In Privately Owned Smcsmentioning
confidence: 99%