2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Domestication Cause Changes in Growth Reaction Norms? A Study of Farmed, Wild and Hybrid Atlantic Salmon Families Exposed to Environmental Stress

Abstract: One of the most important traits linked with the successful domestication of animals is reducing their sensitivity to environmental stressors in the human controlled environment. In order to examine whether domestication selection in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., over approximately ten generations, has inadvertently selected for reduced responsiveness to stress, we compared the growth reaction norms of 29 wild, hybrid and domesticated families reared together under standard hatchery conditions (control) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
171
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
14
171
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these growth rate differences seem to be less pronounced in wild stream environments and in hatchery conditions simulating a semi-natural environment with restricted food (Solberg et al, 2013a). In our experiments, size-at-age differences between wild and farm offspring measured in the wild were statistically significant but moderate in magnitude (Table 2), with electrofished farm parr being in the order of 5-20% larger and heavier than wild parr, consistent with the findings of these previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these growth rate differences seem to be less pronounced in wild stream environments and in hatchery conditions simulating a semi-natural environment with restricted food (Solberg et al, 2013a). In our experiments, size-at-age differences between wild and farm offspring measured in the wild were statistically significant but moderate in magnitude (Table 2), with electrofished farm parr being in the order of 5-20% larger and heavier than wild parr, consistent with the findings of these previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the other five samples, the residual variance was either highest in the WW group (for example, mass of 1994 cohort electrofished 1+ parr sample) or the FF group (for example, L F and mass of pre-smolts in 1993 cohort hatchery controls). Intriguingly, found that within-family variation in body size of Atlantic salmon (measured in a hatchery setting) diminished with increasing generations of domestication (see also Solberg et al, 2013a). Under fully wild conditions, variance differences between wild, farmed and hybrid families may be largely unpredictable and context dependent, given that our findings did not match those of Skaala et al (2012) despite very similar study designs (but different genetic backgrounds).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This may have introduced a bias in all DD dam offspring data by, for example, their very small variation in egg size relative to other dam crosses. We cannot determine whether the small variation is a result of the domestication process (as suggested for variation in growth; Solberg et al, 2013) or of the close kinship among dams. However, it was not possible to account in our analyses for dam cross-specific variances (except for egg size) because of nonestimable DD dam cross variances.…”
Section: Remarks On Study-related Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they out-grow wild salmon under hatchery conditions (Glover et al 2009, Solberg et al 2013a. Wild salmon populations are regarded as potentially adapted to their natal rivers (Garcia de Leaniz et al 2007, Fraser et al 2011, and the survival of farmed salmon offspring in the wild is lower than for native salmon (McGinnity et al 1997, 2003, Fleming et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%