2011
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.000844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does early nutrition program later bone health in preterm infants?

Abstract: Preterm infants are at risk of metabolic bone disease (MBD) because of an inadequate mineral intake. Although infants with MBD are frequently asymptomatic during the neonatal period, we previously reported that MBD predicted reduced linear growth in infancy and midchildhood. Nevertheless, some studies suggest that preterm infants undergo catch-up growth in bone mineralization during infancy. To examine the hypothesis that early nutrition programs affect later bone health and peak bone mass, we studied 20-y-old… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cohort of preterm infants (gestational age <37 weeks; birth weight <1850 g) recruited between 1982 and 1985 for randomization to various formula and breast milk regimens and studied again in young adulthood, shorter stature, higher body mass index, and lower lumbar spine bone mass compared with reference data was identified. 25 The extent to which radiographic or biochemical rickets impacted peak bone mass accrual is not clear from this study, nor is the extent to which bone mineral accrual in these preterm infants affected their risk of osteoporosis later in life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a cohort of preterm infants (gestational age <37 weeks; birth weight <1850 g) recruited between 1982 and 1985 for randomization to various formula and breast milk regimens and studied again in young adulthood, shorter stature, higher body mass index, and lower lumbar spine bone mass compared with reference data was identified. 25 The extent to which radiographic or biochemical rickets impacted peak bone mass accrual is not clear from this study, nor is the extent to which bone mineral accrual in these preterm infants affected their risk of osteoporosis later in life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…22 Lack of improvement in BMC could also be due to the fact that our study included a few (n = 7) very low birth weight infants (,1000 g), who are likely to have maximum changes in BMC and BMD due to higher risk of metabolic bone disease. 23,24 Even though daily supplementation with 800 IU significantly reduced the prevalence of VDD at 40 weeks and at 3 months' CA, there is concern that 800 IU/day could result in vitamin D excess in a small proportion of infants. We found an incidence of 2.4% (95% CI: 0.06%-12.5%) in the intervention group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies give us evidence of postnatal growth delays at 8-12 years of age 17,18 . Therefore, if it prevention fails, the presence of fractures, dolichocephaly and delays in growth rate, as well as other long-term effects, such as osteopenia in adulthood, would be favored 16,19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%