1985
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1985.10885645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Familiarity Have an Effect on Recall Independent of Its Effect on Original Learning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge allows a learner to imbue a learning experience with greater meaning resulting in higher levels of inferential processing (Pearson, Hansen, & Gordon, 1979), and a greater ability to attend to the crucial elements of the experience (Spilich, Vesonder, Chiesi, & Voss, 1979). Gagne et al (1985) found that school children who knew more about a topic to begin with evidenced considerably less memory loss of a lesson content over a onemonth period, relative to their initially low-knowledge classmates. This effect was apparent even though the low-knowledge students were allowed more time to study the materials ofthe original lesson.…”
Section: Are Prior Knowledge Effects Obvious?mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowledge allows a learner to imbue a learning experience with greater meaning resulting in higher levels of inferential processing (Pearson, Hansen, & Gordon, 1979), and a greater ability to attend to the crucial elements of the experience (Spilich, Vesonder, Chiesi, & Voss, 1979). Gagne et al (1985) found that school children who knew more about a topic to begin with evidenced considerably less memory loss of a lesson content over a onemonth period, relative to their initially low-knowledge classmates. This effect was apparent even though the low-knowledge students were allowed more time to study the materials ofthe original lesson.…”
Section: Are Prior Knowledge Effects Obvious?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Information-processing theories suggest that the possession and activation of relevant knowledge enables a learner to encode new experiences with a high level ofefficiency.Within the appropriate domain, a knowledgeable learner is able to employ highly effective acquisition strategies such as organisation, chunking, and elaboration (Ornstein & Naus, 1985). Knowledgeable learners are able to assimilate relatively high levels of information without suffering overload effects such as interference in memory processing (Charness, 1976), since they process more information, at a deeper processing level, and in less time (Gagne, Bell, Yarbrough, & Weidemann, 1985). For example, existing knowledge enables a reader to integrate sentences and paragraphs quickly and in an efficient manner in order to construct higher level mental models-that is, the 'big picture' (Fincher-Kiefer, Post, Greene, & Voss, 1988).…”
Section: Research Into Learning Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any discussion of LTM encoding and retention is deficient if not concurrently considering the activity of learning. For learning to occur, current or familiar knowledge and skills (LTM) provide a scaffold upon which new knowledge elements can be meaningfully processed in working memory (Gagne, Bell, Yarbrough, & Weidemann, 1985, see section 1.4). Indeed, Stern (1985) suggested that the flow of information firstly connects perceptual information to LTM and then to the short-term store.…”
Section: Encoding and Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that material that is well learned will be equally well remembered, independent of learning conditions. However, E. Gagne et al (1985) had middle-school students learn paragraphs on topics of high or moderate familiarity (meaningfulness, prior knowledge). The students were tested for recall either several minutes or 4 weeks after learning.…”
Section: Effect Of Prior Knowledge On the Original Learning-retentmentioning
confidence: 99%