Does Global Progress on Sanitation Really Lag behind Water? An Analysis of Global Progress on Community- and Household-Level Access to Safe Water and Sanitation

Abstract

Safe drinking water and sanitation are important determinants of human health and wellbeing and have recently been declared human rights by the international community. Increased access to both were included in the Millennium Development Goals under a single dedicated target for 2015. This target was reached in 2010 for water but sanitation will fall short; however, there is an important difference in the benchmarks used for assessing global access. For drinking water the benchmark is community-level access whilst for sanitation it is household-level access, so a pit latrine shared between households does not count toward the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target. We estimated global progress for water and sanitation under two scenarios: with equivalent household- and community-level benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that the “sanitation deficit” is apparent only when household-level sanitation access is contrasted with community-level water access. When equivalent benchmarks are used for water and sanitation, the global deficit is as great for water as it is for sanitation, and sanitation progress in the MDG-period (1990–2015) outstrips that in water. As both drinking water and sanitation access yield greater benefits at the household-level than at the community-level, we conclude that any post–2015 goals should consider a household-level benchmark for both.

Multiple Household Water Sources and Their Use in Remote Communities With Evidence From Pacific Island Countries

“…Formulating broadly applicable survey questions that yield useful data may not yet be possible as many knowledge gaps remain. Likewise, establishing global indicators and targets and benchmarking success is a process requiring a nuanced understanding and may have unintended consequences, as reported with respect to the water and sanitation MDG and discussed in the buildup to the SDGs (Bain et al, ; Bartram et al, ; Cumming et al, ; Onda et al, ). Refining questions, integrating them into surveys and finally receiving data takes many years and data value is from sequential application.…”

Typhoid Fever as a Challenge for Developing Countries and Elusive Diagnostic Approaches Available for the Enteric Fever

“…The vaccine may also need to be formulated differently for infants. For example, Ty21a at times has been available in both a sachet formulation for use in young children as well as enteric-coated capsules for use in older children and adults [106][107][108][109][110][111]. Finally, safety of live attenuated vaccines needs to be determined in immuno compromised subjects and also the very young prior to wide spread use.…”

“…Vi capsular Polysaccharide (Vi-PS) vaccines confer protection approximately 7 days post immunization. As is typical for polysaccharide vaccines, they do not induce protective immune responses in children <2 years of age [107,108]. …”

Addressing Sustainability of Sanitation Systems

“…Lacking household-level access to safe water and hygienic toilets is still a global problem, affecting a third of the world population in 2015 (Cumming et al, 2014). The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6 asks governments to 'ensure access to water and sanitation for all', as 'due to bad economics or poor infrastructure, every year millions of people, most of them children, die from diseases associated with inadequate water supply, sanitation and hygiene' (UNO, 2018).…”