Does globalization hurt the poor?

Abstract

This paper examines analytically and empirically the extent to which globalization affects the poor in developing countries. I begin with a description of various channels through which trade openness and financial integration may have an adverse effect on poverty. I also stress the possible non-linearities involved – possibilities that have been seldom recognized in the existing literature. I then present cross-country regressions that relate measures of real and financial integration to poverty. The regressions control for changes in income per capita, as well as various other macroeconomic and structural variables, such as inflation, changes in the real exchange rate and the terms of trade, and schooling indicators. I use both individual indicators of trade and financial openness, and a “globalization index” based on principal components analysis, and test for both linear and nonlinear effects. The results suggest the existence of an inverted U-shape relationship between globalization and poverty. At low levels, globalization appears to hurt the poor; but beyond a certain threshold, it seems to reduce poverty – possibly because it brings with it renewed impetus for reform. Thus, globalization may hurt the poor not because it went too far, but rather because it did not go far enough. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004Globalization, poverty, cross-country regressions,

Distributional effects of foreign direct investment on poverty: the case of Vietnam

“…The researchers provide surveys of the relevant literature and consider both the positive and negative impacts of FDI to the poor -indirectly by growth-enhancing effects, and directly by distributional effects. The majority of the reviewed studies support that FDI may improve poverty rates and income distribution (Agénor, 2003;Sharma and Gani, 2004;MacDonald and Majeed, 2010b;Reiter and Steensma, 2010;Lehnert et al, 2013;Ucal, 2014;Soumaré, 2015). Other studies make points towards FDI having neutral or negative effects on the poor (Stiglitz, 2002;Huang et al, 2010;Gohou and Soumaré, 2012;Groot, 2014;Uttama, 2015;Agénor, 2003).…”

Globalization and Poverty Nexus: A Panel Data Analysis

“…Kanbur (1998) views technological changes as one of the potential sources of widening gaps between unskilled and skilled labour. Likewise, Agenor (2004) also notes that more trade openness and economic integration lead to significant substitution between unskilled labour and capital, contrary to higher complementarity between skilled labour and capital.…”

The Effect of Trade Openness on Income Inequality with the Role of Institutional Quality

“…The continuous efforts of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to fight for no boundaries and discrimination between its trading partners has encouraged many researchers to investigate the chain effects of trade openness on income distribution (see for example, Ravallion and Jayasuriya, 1988;Glewwe, 1988;Carneiro and Arbache, 2003;Agenor, 2004;Meschi and Vivarelli, 2008;Roses, Galarraga and Tirado, 2010;Mah, 2013).…”