2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2995422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Innovation Lead to Firm Growth? Explorative versus Exploitative Innovations

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the relationship between innovation and firm growth. We implement a classification of innovations based on whether they are explorative or exploitative, taking advantage of a unique Swedish dataset for the period 1997 to 2012. The data allow us to construct each firm's innovation history. Panel regression estimations, together with an instrumental variable method, confirm a significant and positive effect of both exploitative and explorative innovation on firms' employment growth. Mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Lachenmaier and Rottmann (2011) advocate that innovation decisions are frequently built on long-term choices; hence, innovation process is deliberated at least one period before it occurs, leading organizational innovation as predetermined. As observed by Braunerhjelm et al (2016), analyzing the effect of innovation on firm growth on a Swedish panel data set, predetermined variables are likely to be correlated with past error terms; hence they instrumented the innovation variables used with their one period lagged level values, which ceteris paribus are expected to be not correlated with the error term. The validity of the instruments used in the estimations can be checked by means of the Hansen-J test for over identifying restrictions.…”
Section: Econometric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Lachenmaier and Rottmann (2011) advocate that innovation decisions are frequently built on long-term choices; hence, innovation process is deliberated at least one period before it occurs, leading organizational innovation as predetermined. As observed by Braunerhjelm et al (2016), analyzing the effect of innovation on firm growth on a Swedish panel data set, predetermined variables are likely to be correlated with past error terms; hence they instrumented the innovation variables used with their one period lagged level values, which ceteris paribus are expected to be not correlated with the error term. The validity of the instruments used in the estimations can be checked by means of the Hansen-J test for over identifying restrictions.…”
Section: Econometric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of larger and well performed firms, they maintain their growth rate. Braunerhjelm et al (2016) used the time series data of Swedish firm from the period of 2002 to 2012 to create a model and conclude that there is a positive relationship between employment growth and innovation. The firm innovation and employment growth depends upon the size of the firm.…”
Section: Innovation and Firm Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation is vital to healthy industry competition and a principal driver of organisational growth. Innovative organisations are more productive and grow faster than phlegmatic competitors (Braunerhjelm et al, 2016;Kerr, 2016). The core operations of companies are changing with the emergence of opportunities to optimise products and services, including business intelligence, virtualisation and information and communication technology (ICT); therefore, adjustments to business models are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%