Does it Matter Where You Teach? Insights from a Quasi-Experimental Study on Student Engagement in an Active Learning Classroom

Abstract

Active learning has experienced a recent resurgence with the advent of specialized active learning classrooms. While the fundamental theory behind active learning is anything but new, a relatively recent finding is that active learning pedagogies thrive in suitable active learning classrooms. To date, studies of active learning have focused on outcomes such as student performance. The quasi-experimental study described in this article investigated self-ratings of student engagement as an outcome of active learning in active learning classrooms using a novel instrument that accounts for known factors of engagement in addition to the contribution of the learning environment—the classroom. We delineated the relative contributions of instructor, classmates, and classroom to self-rated student engagement through student surveys in both a traditional classroom and an active learning classroom in two highly similar courses with the same instructor. Our findings were that the configuration of the classroom had a direct influence on self-ratings of student engagement above and beyond instructor contributions. In this article, we describe these findings and how, with careful consideration of course design and a classroom that fits the instructor’s pedagogy, optimal levels of perceived student engagement can be achieved. This knowledge is important to future educational policy on construction and scheduling, as the resurgence of active learning in higher education increasingly reveals deficiencies in physical learning environments.

A Systems Approach to Improving Foundational Reading Skills at a Preschool in India

“…A major shift that took place in terms of pedagogy was from traditional teachercentered approaches that made students passive learners to more student-centered approaches that promote active engagement in the learning process. Several recent studies have found that active classrooms significantly improve student engagement across various disciplines and grade levels [88][89][90][91]. The Vice Principal explained, "they (students) were learning like robots .…”

The Integration of Community Problem Analysis and Involvement in Teaching and Learning

“…It can be put into practice and applied as a process in which learners participate in developing thinking processes, analyzing, studying, researching, experimenting, and seeking knowledge by themselves (Bonwel & Eison, 1991) according to their aptitudes. Interest with a variety of processes and learning resources both inside and outside the classroom can bring knowledge and experiences to improve the quality of life of oneself, society, and the public (Ministry of Education 2018: [11][12][13][14]. Active learning is a process in which learners must take action (Bonwell & Jame, 1993; Holec & Marynowski, 2020; Karcher et al, 2022).…”

Instructor Perception of Incorporating Active Learning in College of Agriculture Classrooms

“…This is especially true for pre-tenure faculty who have added concerns related to the promotion and tenure process (Wieman, Perkins, and Gilbert 2010). The transition to an active learning classroom environment may also be perceived as relinquishing control and more time consuming because instructors must prepare course activities (Holec and Marynowski 2020;Michael 2007).…”