Does Lack of Knowledge Lead to Misperceptions? Disentangling the Factors Modulating Public Knowledge About and Perceptions Toward Sharks

Abstract

Identifying sources of variability in public perceptions and attitudes toward sharks can assist managers and conservationists with developing effective strategies to raise awareness and support for the conservation of threatened shark species. This study examined the effect of several demographic, economic and socioenvironmental factors on the quality of knowledge about and perceptions toward sharks in two contrasting scenarios from northeastern Brazil: a shark hazardous coastal region and a marine protected insular area. Ordered logistic regression models were built using Likert data collected with a self-administered questionnaire survey (N = 1094). A clear relationship between education, knowledge and perceptions was found, with low education level and knowledge of sharks resulting in more negative perceptions toward these species. Prejudice toward sharks stemmed as a potentially limiting factor because the positive effects of other variables such as affinity for nature and specific knowledge about sharks were superseded by the effects of negative prejudice. Other practical factors such as age, economic level, and gender, also influenced respondent's knowledge and perceptions and could provide a guidance for optimizing socioenvironmental gains relative to public engagement efforts. Results also suggested that populations inhabiting regions with high shark bite incidence likely require distinct outreach methods because some factors underlying knowledge and perception dynamics exhibited structural differences in their effects when compared to the trends observed in a marine protected area. Altogether, public perceptions and attitudes toward sharks could be feasibly enhanced with educational development and nature experiencing strategies. Moreover, disseminating shark-specific knowledge across the society might catalyze support for the conservation of these species in a cost-effective way. This study provides a

An etiological examination of behavioral intentions to support shark and stingray conservancy: the effects of beliefs in elasmobranchs’ cognitive and affective capacities

“…This work represents the first time that such an examination of the effects of attitudes and beliefs on behavioral intentions to support shark and stingray conservation has been conducted on a population from California, an important white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) aggregation site (e.g., Anderson et al, 2021). Findings from this work can aid in the design of educational and promotional materials intended to promote the knowledge of and conservation of animals, especially as it relates to apex predators and other species that humans have been conditioned to fear (Afonso et al, 2020). Research shows that these fears are largely unfounded but persist due to sensationalized popular media portrayals and highly selective media coverage.…”

A shark's eye view: testing the ‘mistaken identity theory’ behind shark bites on humans

“…Such measures can impact vulnerable shark populations and affect non-target species caught unintentionally as bycatch [5,6]. Public support for these invasive mitigation measures is thought, at least in part, to reflect the disproportionate level of fear associated with sharks [7,8] and the uncertainties that still surround the reasons for, and possible prevention of, shark bites [9,10].…”